Literature DB >> 19734080

25-hydroxyvitamin D measurement, 2009: a review for clinicians.

Neil Binkley1, Diane Krueger, Gary Lensmeyer.   

Abstract

As clinicians are more widely appreciating the endemic nature of low vitamin D status, measurement of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), the accepted measure of vitamin D status, has increased. Challenges to 25(OH)D measurement include the presence of 2 forms of vitamin D-ergocalciferol and cholecalciferol (vitamin D(2) and vitamin D(3), respectively)- and the hydrophobic nature of vitamin D. The current state of 25(OH)D measurement is reviewed; modest differences between methodologies persist and confound the application of a single cut point (e.g., 30 ng/mL/75 nmol/L) for the diagnosis of low vitamin D status. The absence of standard calibrators contributes to between-laboratory differences in 25(OH)D measurement. Until there is improved assay standardization and subsequent evidence-based consensus, it seems premature to recommend widespread screening 25(OH)D measurement. Selectively obtaining 25(OH)D measurement in individuals at clinical risk for vitamin D deficiency and/or those most likely to promptly experience benefits from supplementation seems appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19734080     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2009.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  15 in total

1.  Do random estimations of vitamin D3 and parathyroid hormone reflect the 24-h profile in the critically ill?

Authors:  Bala Venkatesh; Ben Davidson; Katherine Robinson; Ranald Pascoe; Charles Appleton; Mark Jones
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in people with a solid tumor cancer diagnosis: the tip of the iceberg?

Authors:  Katherine Hauser; Declan Walsh; Shiva Shrotriya; Matthew Karafa
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Why bother to take vitamins?

Authors:  Alison Morton
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D(2&3) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(2&3) by tandem mass spectrometry: A primate multispecies comparison.

Authors:  Toni E Ziegler; Amita Kapoor; Curtis J Hedman; Neil Binkley; Joseph W Kemnitz
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.371

Review 5.  Skin cancer and vitamin D: an update.

Authors:  Candy Wyatt; Rachel E Neale; Robyn M Lucas
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2015-02-25

6.  Osteoporosis in men: insights for the clinician.

Authors:  Robert A Adler
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.346

7.  Association between vitamin D levels and allergy-related outcomes vary by race and other factors.

Authors:  Ganesa Wegienka; Suzanne Havstad; Edward M Zoratti; Haejin Kim; Dennis R Ownby; Christine Cole Johnson
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 10.793

8.  Vitamin d status and cardiometabolic risk factors in long-term psychiatric inpatients.

Authors:  Anwar K Abdullah; Salman Khan; Shaheen F Mustafa; Abu A Qutubuddin; Charles M Davis
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2012-02-09

9.  Current status of clinical 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurement: an assessment of between-laboratory agreement.

Authors:  Neil Binkley; Diane C Krueger; Sarah Morgan; Donald Wiebe
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 3.786

10.  Determinants of vitamin D status in fair-skinned women of childbearing age at northern latitudes.

Authors:  Linnea Hedlund; Petra Brembeck; Hanna Olausson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.