BACKGROUND:Subcutaneous allergen-specific immunotherapy is an effective treatment of IgE-mediated allergies, but it requires repeated allergen injections with a risk of systemic allergic reactions. Transcutaneous immunotherapy may improve patient compliance and safety. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of epicutaneous allergen immunotherapy. METHODS: This monocentric, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was conducted from March 2006 to December 2007 at the University Hospital Zurich. Thirty-seven adult patients with positive skin prick and nasal provocation tests to grass pollen were randomized to receive patches containing either allergen (n = 21) or placebo (n = 16). Treatment took place before and during the pollen season 2006, and follow-up visits took place before (n = 26) and after the pollen season 2007 (n = 30). The primary outcome measures were nasal provocation tests. RESULTS: Allergen-treated patients showed significantly decreased scores in nasal provocation tests in the first (P < .001) and second year (P = .003) after treatment. In contrast, placebo-treated patients had decreased scores in the first treatment year, 2006 (P = .03), but the effect diminished in the second year (P = .53). Although improvement of nasal provocation test scores was not significantly better in the verum versus placebo group, the overall treatment success was rated significantly higher by the allergen-treated group than by the placebo group (2006, P = .02; 2007, P = .005). No severe adverse events were observed. Occurrence of eczema after allergen patch applications proved stimulation of specific T-cell responses, but was noted as an adverse effect of the treatment. CONCLUSION:Epicutaneous allergen immunotherapy is a promising strategy to treat allergies and merits further investigation.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous allergen-specific immunotherapy is an effective treatment of IgE-mediated allergies, but it requires repeated allergen injections with a risk of systemic allergic reactions. Transcutaneous immunotherapy may improve patient compliance and safety. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of epicutaneous allergen immunotherapy. METHODS: This monocentric, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was conducted from March 2006 to December 2007 at the University Hospital Zurich. Thirty-seven adult patients with positive skin prick and nasal provocation tests to grass pollen were randomized to receive patches containing either allergen (n = 21) or placebo (n = 16). Treatment took place before and during the pollen season 2006, and follow-up visits took place before (n = 26) and after the pollen season 2007 (n = 30). The primary outcome measures were nasal provocation tests. RESULTS: Allergen-treated patients showed significantly decreased scores in nasal provocation tests in the first (P < .001) and second year (P = .003) after treatment. In contrast, placebo-treated patients had decreased scores in the first treatment year, 2006 (P = .03), but the effect diminished in the second year (P = .53). Although improvement of nasal provocation test scores was not significantly better in the verum versus placebo group, the overall treatment success was rated significantly higher by the allergen-treated group than by the placebo group (2006, P = .02; 2007, P = .005). No severe adverse events were observed. Occurrence of eczema after allergen patch applications proved stimulation of specific T-cell responses, but was noted as an adverse effect of the treatment. CONCLUSION: Epicutaneous allergen immunotherapy is a promising strategy to treat allergies and merits further investigation.
Authors: Sarah K Wise; Sandra Y Lin; Elina Toskala; Richard R Orlandi; Cezmi A Akdis; Jeremiah A Alt; Antoine Azar; Fuad M Baroody; Claus Bachert; G Walter Canonica; Thomas Chacko; Cemal Cingi; Giorgio Ciprandi; Jacquelynne Corey; Linda S Cox; Peter Socrates Creticos; Adnan Custovic; Cecelia Damask; Adam DeConde; John M DelGaudio; Charles S Ebert; Jean Anderson Eloy; Carrie E Flanagan; Wytske J Fokkens; Christine Franzese; Jan Gosepath; Ashleigh Halderman; Robert G Hamilton; Hans Jürgen Hoffman; Jens M Hohlfeld; Steven M Houser; Peter H Hwang; Cristoforo Incorvaia; Deborah Jarvis; Ayesha N Khalid; Maritta Kilpeläinen; Todd T Kingdom; Helene Krouse; Desiree Larenas-Linnemann; Adrienne M Laury; Stella E Lee; Joshua M Levy; Amber U Luong; Bradley F Marple; Edward D McCoul; K Christopher McMains; Erik Melén; James W Mims; Gianna Moscato; Joaquim Mullol; Harold S Nelson; Monica Patadia; Ruby Pawankar; Oliver Pfaar; Michael P Platt; William Reisacher; Carmen Rondón; Luke Rudmik; Matthew Ryan; Joaquin Sastre; Rodney J Schlosser; Russell A Settipane; Hemant P Sharma; Aziz Sheikh; Timothy L Smith; Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn; Jody R Tversky; Maria C Veling; De Yun Wang; Marit Westman; Magnus Wickman; Mark Zacharek Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 3.858