Literature DB >> 19733228

A catch-up validation study on reconstructed human epidermis (SkinEthic RHE) for full replacement of the Draize skin irritation test.

Nathalie Alépée1, Carine Tornier, Cécile Robert, Carole Amsellem, Marie-Hélène Roux, Olivier Doucet, Jean Pachot, Marisa Méloni, Anne de Brugerolle de Fraissinette.   

Abstract

Efforts to fully replace the in vivo Draize skin irritation test, according to the Directive 67/548/ECC or OECD TG 404, were reinforced with the seventh Amendment of the Cosmetic Directive and the REACh regulation. In 2007, the EpiSkin test method was scientifically validated and recognized as the stand alone method to discriminate skin irritants (R38) from non-irritants (no label) according to the definition of the EU risk phrases. An ECVAM performance standards (PS) document was defined to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of other analogous test methods (ECVAM SIVS, May 2007). The present test was designed to determine the reliability and relevance of the Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) model commercialized by SkinEthic. The RHE skin irritation test method consisted to topically apply topically the test substances for 42min followed by a 42h post-incubation. The main selected endpoint was the cell viability (MTT reduction), with a threshold of 50% viability. The RHE test method showed a good intra and inter-laboratory reproducibilities in a multicentric study involving three independent laboratories. The SkinEthic RHE test method showed to be relevant and reliable with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 80% (MTT only) and was not improved by integrating another endpoint such as IL-1alpha. The overall accuracy was 85% resulting in the recognition of the SkinEthic RHE test method, by the ECVAM Scientific Advisory Committee in November 2008, as a stand alone replacement test method for the Draize rabbit in vivo test, as a screen, or as part of a sequential testing strategy in a weight of evidence approach, for classifying non-irritant and irritant test substances, depending on country requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19733228     DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  12 in total

Review 1.  Engineered Skin Tissue Equivalents for Product Evaluation and Therapeutic Applications.

Authors:  Sana Suhail; Naseem Sardashti; Devina Jaiswal; Swetha Rudraiah; Manoj Misra; Sangamesh G Kumbar
Journal:  Biotechnol J       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 2.  -Omics potential of in vitro skin models for radiation exposure.

Authors:  Leyla A Akh; Mohammad O Ishak; Jennifer F Harris; Trevor G Glaros; Zachary J Sasiene; Phillip M Mach; Laura M Lilley; Ethan M McBride
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 9.207

3.  Comet assay in reconstructed 3D human epidermal skin models--investigation of intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility with coded chemicals.

Authors:  Astrid A Reus; Kerstin Reisinger; Thomas R Downs; Gregory J Carr; Andreas Zeller; Raffaella Corvi; Cyrille A M Krul; Stefan Pfuhler
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Improvement of a Three-Layered in vitro Skin Model for Topical Application of Irritating Substances.

Authors:  Freia F Schmidt; Sophia Nowakowski; Petra J Kluger
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-05-08

5.  Design and Characterization of Elastic Artificial Skin Containing Adenosine-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for Treating Wrinkles.

Authors:  Sooho Yeo; Sukkyun Jung; Heui Kyoung Cho; Young Ho Kim; Gi Hwan Kim; Dohyun Kim; Byoung Hyen Ko; Jaehwi Lee
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 6.321

6.  Nano- and Micro-Porous Chitosan Membranes for Human Epidermal Stratification and Differentiation.

Authors:  Simona Salerno; Maria Penelope De Santo; Enrico Drioli; Loredana De Bartolo
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27

7.  Accounting for Precision Uncertainty of Toxicity Testing: Methods to Define Borderline Ranges and Implications for Hazard Assessment of Chemicals.

Authors:  Silke Gabbert; Miriam Mathea; Susanne N Kolle; Robert Landsiedel
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.302

8.  Assessment of the dermal and ocular irritation potential of lomefloxacin by using in vitro methods.

Authors:  Jun-Ho Ahn; Ki-Hwan Eum; Michael Lee
Journal:  Toxicol Res       Date:  2010-03

9.  Mechanisms of ivermectin-induced wound healing.

Authors:  Daniel Kwesi Sia; Kwesi Boadu Mensah; Tony Opoku-Agyemang; Raphael D Folitse; David Obiri Darko
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Design and Characterisation of pH-Responsive Photosensitiser-Loaded Nano-Transfersomes for Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy.

Authors:  Sooho Yeo; Il Yoon; Woo Kyoung Lee
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 6.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.