PURPOSE: The majority of patients with brain metastases from melanoma receive whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). However, the results are poor. Hypofractionation regimens failed to improve the outcome of these patients. This study investigates a potential benefit from escalation of the WBRT dose beyond the "standard" regimen 30 Gy in 10 fractions (10x3 Gy). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data from 51 melanoma patients receiving WBRT alone were retrospectively analyzed. A dosage of 10x3 Gy (n = 33) was compared with higher doses including 40 Gy/20 fractions (n = 11) and 45 Gy/15 fractions (n = 7) for survival (OS) and local (intracerebral) control (LC). Additional potential prognostic factors were evaluated: age, gender, performance status, number of metastases, extracerebral metastases, and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class. RESULTS: At 6 months, OS rates were 27% after 10x3 Gy and 50% after higher doses (p = 0.009). The OS rates at 12 months were 4% and 20%. On multivariate analysis, higher WBRT doses (p = 0.010), fewer than four brain metastases (p = 0.012), no extracerebral metastases (p = 0.006), and RPA class 1 (p = 0.005) were associated with improved OS. The LC rates at 6 months were 23% after 10x3 Gy and 50% after higher doses (p = 0.021). The LC rates at 12 months were 0% and 13%. On multivariate analysis, higher WBRT doses (p = 0.020) and fewer than brain metastases (p = 0.002) were associated with better LC. CONCLUSIONS: Given the limitations of a retrospective study, the findings suggest that patients with brain metastases from melanoma receiving WBRT alone may benefit from dose escalation beyond 10x3 Gy. The hypothesis generated by this study must be confirmed in a randomized trial stratifying for significant prognostic factors. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PURPOSE: The majority of patients with brain metastases from melanoma receive whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). However, the results are poor. Hypofractionation regimens failed to improve the outcome of these patients. This study investigates a potential benefit from escalation of the WBRT dose beyond the "standard" regimen 30 Gy in 10 fractions (10x3 Gy). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data from 51 melanomapatients receiving WBRT alone were retrospectively analyzed. A dosage of 10x3 Gy (n = 33) was compared with higher doses including 40 Gy/20 fractions (n = 11) and 45 Gy/15 fractions (n = 7) for survival (OS) and local (intracerebral) control (LC). Additional potential prognostic factors were evaluated: age, gender, performance status, number of metastases, extracerebral metastases, and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class. RESULTS: At 6 months, OS rates were 27% after 10x3 Gy and 50% after higher doses (p = 0.009). The OS rates at 12 months were 4% and 20%. On multivariate analysis, higher WBRT doses (p = 0.010), fewer than four brain metastases (p = 0.012), no extracerebral metastases (p = 0.006), and RPA class 1 (p = 0.005) were associated with improved OS. The LC rates at 6 months were 23% after 10x3 Gy and 50% after higher doses (p = 0.021). The LC rates at 12 months were 0% and 13%. On multivariate analysis, higher WBRT doses (p = 0.020) and fewer than brain metastases (p = 0.002) were associated with better LC. CONCLUSIONS: Given the limitations of a retrospective study, the findings suggest that patients with brain metastases from melanoma receiving WBRT alone may benefit from dose escalation beyond 10x3 Gy. The hypothesis generated by this study must be confirmed in a randomized trial stratifying for significant prognostic factors. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Naamit K Gerber; Robert J Young; Christopher A Barker; Jedd D Wolchok; Timothy A Chan; Yoshiya Yamada; Leigh Friguglietti; Kathryn Beal Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-10-02 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Jadwiga Nowak-Sadzikowska; Tomasz Walasek; Jerzy Jakubowicz; Paweł Blecharz; Marian Reinfuss Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2015-12-29
Authors: Steven E Schild; Deepti Behl; Svetomir N Markovic; Paul D Brown; Jonathan R Sande; Richard L Deming; Kendrith M Rowland; James D Bearden Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Adam C Olson; Samantha Thomas; Rosie Qin; Bhavana Singh; Joseph K Salama; John Kirkpatrick; April Ks Salama Journal: Melanoma Manag Date: 2016-08-22
Authors: Henrik Hauswald; Jan-Oliver Dittmar; Daniel Habermehl; Stefan Rieken; Florian Sterzing; Jürgen Debus; Stephanie E Combs Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 3.481