Literature DB >> 19732804

From ecotoxicology to nanoecotoxicology.

Anne Kahru1, Henri-Charles Dubourguier.   

Abstract

For hazard assessment of NPs quantitative nanoecotoxicological data are required. The objective of this review was to evaluate the currently existing literature data on toxicity (L(E)C50 values) of synthetic NPs in environmentally relevant species in order to: (i) identify tentatively most harmful NPs and most sensitive organism groups, and (ii) to provide relevant ecotoxicological information for further risk assessment. The focus was set on selected synthetic NPs (nano TiO(2), nano ZnO, nano CuO, nano Ag, SWCNTs, MWCNs and C60-fullerenes) and organism groups representing main food-chain levels (bacteria, algae, crustaceans, ciliates, fish, yeasts and nematodes). Altogether 77 effect values were found, mostly for nano TiO(2) (31%), C60 (18%), nano ZnO (17%), nano Ag (13%), SWCNTs and nano CuO (both 9%). Only 3% of the available quantitative ecotoxicological information concerned MWCNTs. Organism-wise, 33% of the data concerned crustaceans, 27% bacteria, 14% algae and 13% fish. For all organism groups studied, solubility of CuO- and ZnO-NPs was a key factor in their aquatic toxicity. On the basis of the 34 median L(E)C50 values derived from 77 individual values, NPs were ranked according to their lowest median L(E)C50 value for the above described organism groups: the most harmful were nano Ag and nano ZnO that were classified "extremely toxic", (L(E)C50<0.1mg/l), followed by C60 fullerenes and nano CuO that were classified "very toxic", (L(E)C50 0.1-1mg/l). SWCNTs and MWCNTs were classified "toxic" (L(E)C50 1-10mg/l). Nano TiO(2) was classified as "harmful", (L(E)C50 10-100mg/l). Throughout, algae and crustaceans (daphnids) were most sensitive and thus probably most vulnerable organism groups in aquatic exposure to NPs. Very low L(E)C50 values should deserve thorough attention of environmental risk assessors for evaluation of the potential adverse effects of synthetic NPs on ecosystems. As the quantitative nanoecotoxicological data are still rare, further studies are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19732804     DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  78 in total

1.  Uptake and toxicity of nano-ZnO in the plant-feeding nematode, Xiphinema vuittenezi: the role of dissolved zinc and nanoparticle-specific effects.

Authors:  Zoltán Sávoly; Krisztina Hrács; Bernhard Pemmer; Christina Streli; Gyula Záray; Péter István Nagy
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Derivation of water quality criteria of phenanthrene using interspecies correlation estimation models for aquatic life in China.

Authors:  Jiangyue Wu; Zhengtao Liu; Zhenguang Yan; Xianliang Yi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Does the exposure mode to ENPs influence their toxicity to aquatic species? A case study with TiO2 nanoparticles and Daphnia magna.

Authors:  Beatrice Salieri; Andrea Pasteris; Jonas Baumann; Serena Righi; Jan Köser; Rosaria D'Amato; Benedetta Mazzesi; Juliane Filser
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  Practical considerations for conducting ecotoxicity test methods with manufactured nanomaterials: what have we learnt so far?

Authors:  Richard D Handy; Nico van den Brink; Mark Chappell; Martin Mühling; Renata Behra; Maria Dušinská; Peter Simpson; Jukka Ahtiainen; Awadhesh N Jha; Jennifer Seiter; Anthony Bednar; Alan Kennedy; Teresa F Fernandes; Michael Riediker
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Response of biochemical biomarkers in the aquatic crustacean Daphnia magna exposed to silver nanoparticles.

Authors:  Lea Ulm; Adela Krivohlavek; Darija Jurašin; Marija Ljubojević; Goran Šinko; Tea Crnković; Irena Žuntar; Sandra Šikić; Ivana Vinković Vrček
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Meta-analysis of cellular toxicity for cadmium-containing quantum dots.

Authors:  Eunkeu Oh; Rong Liu; Andre Nel; Kelly Boeneman Gemill; Muhammad Bilal; Yoram Cohen; Igor L Medintz
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 39.213

7.  How test vessel properties affect the fate of silver nitrate and sterically stabilized silver nanoparticles in two different test designs used for acute tests with Daphnia magna.

Authors:  Yvonne Sakka; Jan Koeser; Juliane Filser
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 8.  Revisiting the cytotoxicity of quantum dots: an in-depth overview.

Authors:  Sohrab Nikazar; Vishnu Sankar Sivasankarapillai; Abbas Rahdar; Salim Gasmi; P S Anumol; Muhammad Salman Shanavas
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2020-03-05

9.  Heatable carbon nanotube composite membranes for sustainable recovery from biofouling.

Authors:  Noe T Alvarez; Ryan Noga; So-Ryong Chae; George A Sorial; Hodon Ryu; Vesselin Shanov
Journal:  Biofouling       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.209

Review 10.  Nanomedicine: promises and challenges for the future of public health.

Authors:  Michelle Pautler; Sara Brenner
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2010-10-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.