Literature DB >> 19731658

Submarine groundwater discharge of total mercury and monomethylmercury to central California coastal waters.

Friank J Black1, Adina Paytan, Karen L Knee, Nicholas R De Sieyes, Priya M Ganguli, Ellen Gray, A Russell Flegal.   

Abstract

Fluxes of total mercury (Hg(T)) and monomethylmercury (MMHg) associated with submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) at two sites onthe central California coast were estimated by combining measurements of Hg(T) and MMHg in groundwater with the use of short-lived, naturally occurring radium isotopes as tracers of groundwater inputs. Concentrations of Hg(T) were relatively low, ranging from 1.2 to 28.3 pM in filtered groundwater, 0.8 to 11.6 pM in filtered surface waters, and 2.5 to 12.9 pM in unfiltered surface waters. Concentrations of MMHg ranged from < 0.04 to 3.1 pM in filtered groundwater, < 0.04 to 0.53 pM in filtered surface waters, and 0.07 to 1.2 pM in unfiltered surface waters. Multiple linear regression analysis identified significant (p < 0.05) positive correlations between dissolved groundwater concentrations of Hg(T) and those of NH4+ and SiO2, and between dissolved groundwater concentrations of MMHg and those of Hg(T) and NH4+. However, such relationships did not account for the majority of the variability in concentration data for either mercury species in groundwater. Fluxes of Hg(T) via SGD were estimated to be 250 +/- 160 nmol day m(-1) of shoreline at Stinson Beach and 3.0 +/- 2.0 nmol m(-2) day(-1) at Elkhorn Slough. These Hg(T) fluxes are substantially greater than net atmospheric inputs of Hg(T) reported for waters in nearby San Francisco Bay. Calculated fluxes of MMHg to coastal waters via SGD were 10 +/- 12 nmol day(-1) m(-1) of shoreline at Stinson Beach and 0.24 +/- 0.21 nmol m(-2) day at Elkhorn Slough. These MMHg fluxes are similar to benthic fluxes of MMHg out of surface sediments commonly reported for estuarine and coastal environments. Consequently, this work demonstrates that SGD is an important source of both Hg(T) and MMHg to coastal waters along the central California coast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19731658     DOI: 10.1021/es900539c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Microbial community composition across a coastal hydrological system affected by submarine groundwater discharge (SGD).

Authors:  Dini Adyasari; Christiane Hassenrück; Daniel Montiel; Natasha Dimova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Mercury distribution in seawater discharged from a coal-fired power plant equipped with a seawater flue gas desulfurization system.

Authors:  Xiyao Liu; Lumin Sun; Dongxing Yuan; Liqian Yin; Jinsheng Chen; Yaoxing Liu; Chengyu Liu; Ying Liang; Fangfang Lin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Mercury biogeochemical cycling in the ocean and policy implications.

Authors:  Robert P Mason; Anna L Choi; William F Fitzgerald; Chad R Hammerschmidt; Carl H Lamborg; Anne L Soerensen; Elsie M Sunderland
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Mercury Reduction and Methyl Mercury Degradation by the Soil Bacterium Xanthobacter autotrophicus Py2.

Authors:  Amanda K Petrus; Colin Rutner; Songnian Liu; Yingjiao Wang; Heather A Wiatrowski
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Submarine Groundwater Discharge as a Source of Mercury in the Bay of Puck, the Southern Baltic Sea.

Authors:  Beata Szymczycha; Michał Miotk; Janusz Pempkowiak
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2013-05-04       Impact factor: 2.520

6.  Radon (222Rn) as tracer for submarine groundwater discharge investigation-limitations of the approach at shallow wind-exposed coastal settings.

Authors:  Michael Schubert; Jan Scholten; Matthias Kreuzburg; Eric Petermann; Mariele Lopes de Paiva; Dennis Köhler; Volker Liebetrau; John Rapaglia; Michael Schlüter
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 3.307

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.