Literature DB >> 19731147

Sparse coding of birdsong and receptive field structure in songbirds.

Garrett Greene1, David G T Barrett, Kamal Sen, Conor Houghton.   

Abstract

Auditory neurons can be characterized by a spectro-temporal receptive field, the kernel of a linear filter model describing the neuronal response to a stimulus. With a view to better understanding the tuning properties of these cells, the receptive fields of neurons in the zebra finch auditory fore-brain are compared to a set of artificial kernels generated under the assumption of sparseness; that is, the assumption that in the sensory pathway only a small number of neurons need be highly active at any time. The sparse kernels are calculated by finding a sparse basis for a corpus of zebra-finch songs. This calculation is complicated by the highly-structured nature of the songs and requires regularization. The sparse kernels and the receptive fields, though differing in some respects, display several significant similarities, which are described by computing quantative properties such as the seperability index and Q-factor. By comparison, an identical calculation performed on human speech recordings yields a set of kernels which exhibit widely different tuning. These findings imply that Field L neurons are specifically adapted to sparsely encode birdsong and supports the idea that sparsification may be an important element of early sensory processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19731147      PMCID: PMC2794046          DOI: 10.1080/09548980903108267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Network        ISSN: 0954-898X            Impact factor:   1.273


  22 in total

1.  Spectral-temporal receptive fields of nonlinear auditory neurons obtained using natural sounds.

Authors:  F E Theunissen; K Sen; A J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision.

Authors:  W E Vinje; J L Gallant
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-02-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Efficient coding of natural sounds.

Authors:  Michael S Lewicki
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Estimating spatio-temporal receptive fields of auditory and visual neurons from their responses to natural stimuli.

Authors:  F E Theunissen; S V David; N C Singh; A Hsu; W E Vinje; J L Gallant
Journal:  Network       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.273

5.  Linearity of cortical receptive fields measured with natural sounds.

Authors:  Christian K Machens; Michael S Wehr; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Sparse coding of sensory inputs.

Authors:  Bruno A Olshausen; David J Field
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 7.  Could information theory provide an ecological theory of sensory processing?

Authors:  Joseph J Atick
Journal:  Network       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.273

8.  Tuning for spectro-temporal modulations as a mechanism for auditory discrimination of natural sounds.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley; Thane E Fremouw; Anne Hsu; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-04       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Is the early visual system optimised to be energy efficient?

Authors:  Benjamin T Vincent; Roland J Baddeley; Tom Troscianko; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Network       Date:  2005 Jun-Sep       Impact factor: 1.273

10.  Feature analysis of natural sounds in the songbird auditory forebrain.

Authors:  K Sen; F E Theunissen; A J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  6 in total

1.  Optimal compensation for neuron loss.

Authors:  David Gt Barrett; Sophie Denève; Christian K Machens
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Perceptual decision making "through the eyes" of a large-scale neural model of v1.

Authors:  Jianing V Shi; Jim Wielaard; R Theodore Smith; Paul Sajda
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-19

3.  Understanding auditory spectro-temporal receptive fields and their changes with input statistics by efficient coding principles.

Authors:  Lingyun Zhao; Li Zhaoping
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  An efficient coding hypothesis links sparsity and selectivity of neural responses.

Authors:  Florian Blättler; Richard H R Hahnloser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sparse coding can predict primary visual cortex receptive field changes induced by abnormal visual input.

Authors:  Jonathan J Hunt; Peter Dayan; Geoffrey J Goodhill
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Sparse decoding of multiple spike trains for brain-machine interfaces.

Authors:  Ariel Tankus; Itzhak Fried; Shy Shoham
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 5.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.