Literature DB >> 19730854

Variability in the range of inter-anterior superior iliac spine distance and its correlation with femoral head centre. A prospective computed tomography study of 200 adults.

Arun Mullaji1, Gautam M Shetty, Raj Kanna, Amit Sharma.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) is commonly used to estimate the centre of the femoral head and assess limb alignment during surgical procedures. This study aimed to determine the range of inter-anterior superior iliac spine distances (IADs) and inter-femoral head centre distances (IFDs) among individuals and ascertain whether there is correlation between the IFD and the IAD. We also sought to determine whether gender, height and body mass index (BMI) had any influence on IAD and IFD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively measured IAD and IFD in 200 adults, using transverse computed tomography (CT) scans done for medical causes. We also calculated the distance between the pelvic midline and the centre of the femoral head (XY distance) from the measured IFD. The influence of gender, height and body-mass index on IAD and IFD, and the correlation of IAD with IFD, were also studied.
RESULTS: The overall mean IAD, IFD and XY distances were 22.7+/-1.6 cm, 16.0+/-0.8 cm and 8.0+/-0.4 cm, respectively. There was wide variation within the IAD range with 50% (100/200) of the subjects having their IAD within +/-10 mm of the mean compared to 75.5% (151/200) of the subjects with IFD within +/-10 mm of the mean. The probability that the mean XY distance would fall within 10 mm of the true femoral head centre in all subjects was 100%. The gender difference in IAD and IFD was statistically significant (P=0.03 and P<0.001, respectively), height and BMI had no influence, and the correlation of IAD with IFD was weak (0.35).
CONCLUSION: Although the range of IADs showed wide variation among subjects, this study clearly demonstrated the narrow range of the XY distance and IFD in the study population and provides a useful and accurate basis for a new method to determine the femoral head centre clinically and intraoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19730854     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-009-0791-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  9 in total

1.  Identifying the center of the femoral head using ultrasonography to assess the higher accuracy of femoral extramedullary guides in TKA.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Matsuda; Yoshinori Ishii; Kazunori Ichimura
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.601

2.  A clinical method for locating the femoral head centre during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M R Sawant; A Murty; J Ireland
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  A study of sexual variation in Indian femur.

Authors:  Ruma Purkait; Heeresh Chandra
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Oblique upper tibial opening wedge osteotomy for genu varum.

Authors:  Gary Hooper; Hamish Leslie; James Burn; Rowan Schouten; Ili Beci
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  Hip joint center location from palpable bony landmarks--a cadaver study.

Authors:  G K Seidel; D M Marchinda; M Dijkers; R W Soutas-Little
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Femoral pulse as a guide to the mechanical axis in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  G A Horton; F W Reckling
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 7.  Mechanics of the knee and problems in reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  R A Denham; R E Bishop
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1978-08

8.  A model for easy location of the center of the femoral head during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M A Ritter; E D Campbell
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations.

Authors:  J H Bargren; J D Blaha; M A Freeman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.176

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  An alternative method to create extramedullary references in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jai-Gon Seo; Young-Wan Moon; Sang-Hoon Park; Jae-Woo Shim; Sang-Min Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The accuracy of the extramedullary and intramedullary femoral alignment system in total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritic knee.

Authors:  Woon-hwa Jung; Chung-woo Chun; Ji-hoon Lee; Jae-hun Ha; Jae-Heon Jeong
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-08       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Influence of lower limbs discrepancy and pelvic coronal rotation on pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt and sacral slope.

Authors:  Piotr Janusz; Marcin Tyrakowski; Jad Bou Monsef; Kris Siemionow
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Easy identification of mechanical axis during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jai-Gon Seo; Young-Wan Moon; Sang-Min Kim; Byung-Chul Jo; Sang-Hoon Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.759

5.  How precise is the identification of the center of the femoral head during total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Jai-Gon Seo; Young-Wan Moon; Sang-Hoon Park; Ho-Min Kang; Sang-Min Kim
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Extramedullary versus intramedullary femoral alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Qian Tang; Ping Shang; Gang Zheng; Hua-Zi Xu; Hai-Xiao Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 2.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.