Literature DB >> 19730769

Prospective randomized pilot trial comparing closed suction drainage and gravity drainage of the pancreatic duct in pancreaticojejunostomy.

Seung Eun Lee1, Young-Joon Ahn, Jin-Young Jang, Sun-Whe Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreaticojejunal anastomotic leakage remains a major complication after pancreatoduodenectomy, and various means of preventing pancreatic leakage have been studied over the past few decades. The purpose of this study was to determine whether closed suction drainage provided a better option than gravity drainage in pancreaticojejunostomy.
METHODS: Between 2004 and 2006, a total of 110 patients who underwent pancreaticojejunostomy at our institute were enrolled in this prospective randomized pilot study. Fifty-five patients were allocated to the closed suction drainage (CD) group and 55 to the gravity drainage (GD) group. In each patient a polyethylene pediatric feeding tube was inserted into the remnant pancreatic duct across a duct-to-mucosa type pancreaticojejunostomy and totally externalized. The tube was then connected to the aspiration bag of a Jackson-Pratt drain to generate negative pressure or to a bile bag for natural drainage. Pancreatic fistulas were defined and graded as A, B, or C according to the international study group for pancreatic fistulas (ISGPF) criteria.
RESULTS: No differences were found between the GD and CD groups in age, sex distribution, or diagnosis. A pancreatic fistula occurred in 24 patients (43.6%) in the GD group and in 14 (25.5%) in the CD group (P = 0.045). In the GD group, grade B and C fistula occurred in 6 patients (10.9%), whereas in the CD group, this occurred in 5 patients (9.1%).
CONCLUSION: In this study, temporary external drainage of the pancreatic duct with closed suction drainage significantly reduced the incidence of grade A pancreatic fistula. A follow-up randomized prospective multicenter study has been initiated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19730769     DOI: 10.1007/s00534-009-0171-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg        ISSN: 0944-1166


  7 in total

Review 1.  Stents for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Zhiyong Dong; Jing Xu; Zhen Wang; Maxim S Petrov
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-06

Review 2.  Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Yao Cheng; Jie Xia; Mingliang Lai; Nansheng Cheng; Sirong He
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-21

Review 3.  Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Sirong He; Jie Xia; Wei Zhang; Mingliang Lai; Nansheng Cheng; Zuojin Liu; Yao Cheng
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-12-18

4.  Application of single-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Bing-Yang Hu; Jian-Jun Leng; Tao Wan; Wen-Zhi Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-11-27

Review 5.  Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Sirong He; Yao Cheng; Jie Xia; Mingliang Lai; Nansheng Cheng; Zuojin Liu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-06-21

Review 6.  Passive Versus Active Intra-Abdominal Drainage Following Pancreatic Resection: Does A Superior Drainage System Exist? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lily J Park; Laura Baker; Heather Smith; Madeline Lemke; Alexandra Davis; Jad Abou-Khalil; Guillaume Martel; Fady K Balaa; Kimberly A Bertens
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The Double Opposing Semiocclusive Drain Dressing.

Authors:  S Sean Kelishadi; Matthew Zeiderman; Darrell W Freeman; John Paul Tutela; Bradon J Wilhelmi
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 4.283

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.