Girija Syamlal1, Jacek M Mazurek, Ki Moon Bang. 1. Surveillance Branch, Division of Respiratory Disease Studies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA. gos2@cdc.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate national prevalences of lifetime asthma and asthma attacks among workers by age, sex, race, occupation and industry, and estimate population attributable fraction to employment for asthma attacks in the United States. METHODS: The 1997-2004 National Health Interview Survey data for currently working adults aged > or = 18 years were analyzed. RESULTS: Lifetime asthma prevalence was 9.2%; the social services religious and membership organizations industry and the health service occupation had the highest asthma prevalence. Asthma attack prevalence among workers with asthma was 35.4%; the primary metal industry and the health assessment and treating occupation had the highest attack prevalence. Approximately, 5.9% of cases reporting an asthma attack were attributed to employment when considering industries and 3.8% when considering occupations. CONCLUSIONS: Future studies and intervention strategies should address the higher prevalence of asthma in certain industries and occupations.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate national prevalences of lifetime asthma and asthma attacks among workers by age, sex, race, occupation and industry, and estimate population attributable fraction to employment for asthma attacks in the United States. METHODS: The 1997-2004 National Health Interview Survey data for currently working adults aged > or = 18 years were analyzed. RESULTS: Lifetime asthma prevalence was 9.2%; the social services religious and membership organizations industry and the health service occupation had the highest asthma prevalence. Asthma attack prevalence among workers with asthma was 35.4%; the primary metal industry and the health assessment and treating occupation had the highest attack prevalence. Approximately, 5.9% of cases reporting an asthma attack were attributed to employment when considering industries and 3.8% when considering occupations. CONCLUSIONS: Future studies and intervention strategies should address the higher prevalence of asthma in certain industries and occupations.
Authors: Anni Koskinen; Matti Penttilä; Jyri Myller; Sari Hammarén-Malmi; Juha Silvola; Tari Haahtela; Maija Hytönen; Sanna Toppila-Salmi Journal: Am J Rhinol Allergy Date: 2012 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.467
Authors: Ryan F LeBouf; M Abbas Virji; Rena Saito; Paul K Henneberger; Nancy Simcox; Aleksandr B Stefaniak Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Haiyan Wei; Kehong Tan; Rongli Sun; Lihong Yin; Juan Zhang; Yuepu Pu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jyri P Myller; Annika T Luukkainen; Heini S A Huhtala; Tommi V M Torkkeli; Markus E P Rautiainen; Sanna K Toppila-Salmi Journal: Allergy Rhinol (Providence) Date: 2013