Literature DB >> 19730351

Cine-magnetic resonance imaging assessment of intrafraction motion for prostate cancer patients supine or prone with and without a rectal balloon.

Carlos Vargas1, Anneyuko I Saito, Wen Chien Hsi, Daniel Indelicato, Aaron Falchook, Qingguo Zengm, Kenneth Oliver, Sameer Keole, Jim Dempsey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Determine prostate intrafraction motion with Cine-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and deformable registration.
METHODS: A total of 68 cine-MRI studies were done in 17 different series with 4 scans per series in 7 patients. In without rectal balloon (WORB) scans, 100 mL of water was infused in the rectum. Each series consisted of supine and prone, with a rectal balloon (WRB) and WORB. Each scan was performed over 4 minutes. Automatic deformable registration software developed by View Ray, Inc., Cleveland, Ohio was employed to segment the prostate for each cine-MRI image. A time-based analysis was done for the different positions and the use of the rectal balloon.
RESULTS: The variation/standard deviation of the prostate position during 240 seconds was: supine WRB: 0.55 mm, WORB: 1.2 mm, and prone WRB: 1.48 mm, WORB: 2.15 mm (P < 0.001). A strong relationship was observed between time and prostate motion. For the initial 120 s the standard deviation was smaller than for the second 120 s supine WRB 0.54 mm versus 1.37 mm; supine WORB 0.61 mm versus 1.70 mm; prone WRB 0.85 mm versus 1.85 mm; and prone WORB 1.60 mm versus 2.56 mm. The probabilities for prostate staying within +/-2 mm to its initial position are: 94.8% supine WRB; 91.5% supine WORB; 92.3% prone WRB; 79.2% prone WORB.
CONCLUSIONS: Intrafraction prostate motion was found dependent on time, patient position, and the use of a rectal balloon. Relatively stable positions can be obtained for 4 minutes or less especially in the supine position with a rectal balloon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19730351     DOI: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31819fdf7c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of dose decrement from intrafraction motion for prone and supine prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Olsen; Parag J Parikh; Michael Watts; Camille E Noel; Kenneth W Baker; Lakshmi Santanam; Jeff M Michalski
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Image-guided hypofractionated proton beam therapy for low-risk prostate cancer: Analysis of quality of life and toxicity, PCG GU 002.

Authors:  Carlos Enrique Vargas; William Fred Hartsell; Megan Dunn; Sameer Ramchandra Keole; Lucius Doh; John Chang; Gary Lynn Larson
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-03-04

Review 3.  Effectiveness of rectal displacement devices in managing prostate motion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mahdieh Afkhami Ardekani; Hamed Ghaffari; Mahmoud Navaser; Seyed Hamid Zoljalali Moghaddam; Soheila Refahi
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Dosimetric comparison between volumetric modulated arc therapy planning techniques for prostate cancer in the presence of intrafractional organ deformation.

Authors:  Maria Varnava; Iori Sumida; Michio Oda; Keita Kurosu; Fumiaki Isohashi; Yuji Seo; Keisuke Otani; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Toward a real-time in vivo dosimetry system using plastic scintillation detectors.

Authors:  Louis Archambault; Tina M Briere; Falk Pönisch; Luc Beaulieu; Deborah A Kuban; Andrew Lee; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 6.  Reducing rectal injury during external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Riccardo Valdagni; Tiziana Rancati
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Time and frequency to observe fiducial markers in MLC-modulated fields during prostate IMRT/VMAT beam delivery.

Authors:  Qianqian Xu; Xu Tong; Muhan Lin; Xiaoming Chen; Ahmed ElDib; Teh Lin; Lili Chen; C-M Charlie Ma
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.685

8.  Assessment of interfractional prostate motion in patients immobilized in the prone position using a thermoplastic shell.

Authors:  Itaru Ikeda; Takashi Mizowaki; Yohei Sawada; Manabu Nakata; Yoshiki Norihisa; Masakazu Ogura; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Seminal vesicle intrafraction motion analysed with cinematic magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Suki Gill; Kim Dang; Chris Fox; Mathias Bressel; Tomas Kron; Noelene Bergen; Nick Ferris; Rebecca Owen; Sarat Chander; Keen Hun Tai; Farshad Foroudi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Determining intrafractional prostate motion using four dimensional ultrasound system.

Authors:  Mariwan Baker; Claus F Behrens
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.