Literature DB >> 19730240

Five hundred intestinal and multivisceral transplantations at a single center: major advances with new challenges.

Kareem M Abu-Elmagd1, Guilherme Costa, Geoffrey J Bond, Kyle Soltys, Rakesh Sindhi, Tong Wu, Darlene A Koritsky, Bonita Schuster, Lillian Martin, Ruy J Cruz, Noriko Murase, Adriana Zeevi, William Irish, Maher O Ayyash, Laura Matarese, Abhinav Humar, George Mazariegos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the evolution of visceral transplantation in the milieu of surgical technical modifications, new immunosuppressive protocols, and other management strategies. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: With the clinical feasibility of intestinal and multivisceral transplantation in 1990, multifaceted innovative tactics were required to improve outcome and increase procedural practicality.
METHODS: Divided into 3 eras, 453 patients received 500 visceral transplants. The primary used immunosuppression was tacrolimus-steroid-only during Era I (5/90–5/94), adjunct induction with multiple drug therapy during Era II (1/95–6/01), and recipient pretreatment with tacrolimus monotherapy during Era III (7/01–11/08). During Era II/III, donor bone marrow was given (n = 79), intestine was ex vivo irradiated (n = 44), and Epstein-Barr-Virus (EBV)/cytomegalovirus (CMV) loads were monitored.
RESULTS: Actuarial patient survival was 85% at 1-year, 61% at 5-years, 42% at 10-years, and 35% at 15-years with respective graft survival of 80%, 50%, 33%, and 29%. With a 10% retransplantation rate, second/third graft survival was 69% at 1-year and 47% at 5-years. The best outcome was with intestine-liver allografts. Era III rabbit antithymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab pretreatment-based strategy was associated with significant (P < 0.0001) improvement in outcome with 1- and 5-year patient survival of 92% and 70%.
CONCLUSION: Survival has greatly improved over time as management strategies evolved. The current results clearly justify elevating the procedure level to that of other abdominal organs with the privilege to permanently reside in a respected place in the surgical armamentarium. Meanwhile, innovative tactics are still required to conquer long-term hazards of chronic rejection of liver-free allografts and infection of multivisceral recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19730240     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b67725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  51 in total

1.  Long-term survival in visceral transplant recipients in the new era: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Ahmed M Elsabbagh; Jason Hawksworth; Khalid M Khan; Stuart S Kaufman; Nada A Yazigi; Alexander Kroemer; Coleman Smith; Thomas M Fishbein; Cal S Matsumoto
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Donor-Specific Alloantibody Among Intestinal Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Elaine Y Cheng; Matthew J Everly; Hugo Kaneku; Nubia Banuelos; Laura J Wozniak; Robert S Venick; Elizabeth A Marcus; Suzanne V McDiarmid; Ronald W Busuttil; Paul I Terasaki; Douglas G Farmer
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 3.  India's first successful intestinal transplant: the road traveled and the lessons learnt.

Authors:  A S Soin; R Mohanka; N Saraf; A Rastogi; S Goja; B Menon; V Vohra; S Saigal; R Sud; D Kumar; P Bhangui; S Ramachandra; P Singla; G Shetty; K Raghvendra; Kareem M Abu Elmagd
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-07

4.  Pediatric intestinal transplantation: Analysis of the intestinal transplant registry.

Authors:  Vikram K Raghu; Jennifer L Beaumont; Matthew J Everly; Robert S Venick; Florence Lacaille; George V Mazariegos
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2019-09-18

Review 5.  Chronic Rejection After Intestinal Transplant: Where Are We in Order to Avert It?

Authors:  Augusto Lauro; Mihai Oltean; Ignazio R Marino
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Current practice and future perspectives in the treatment of short bowel syndrome in children--a systematic review.

Authors:  S Weih; M Kessler; H Fonouni; M Golriz; M Hafezi; A Mehrabi; S Holland-Cunz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Orthotopic small bowel transplantation in rats.

Authors:  Koji Kitamura; Martin W von Websky; Ichiro Ohsawa; Azin Jaffari; Thomas C Pech; Tim Vilz; Sven Wehner; Shinji Uemoto; Joerg C Kalff; Nico Schaefer
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 8.  From portal to splanchnic venous thrombosis: What surgeons should bear in mind.

Authors:  Quirino Lai; Gabriele Spoletini; Rafael S Pinheiro; Fabio Melandro; Nicola Guglielmo; Jan Lerut
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2014-08-27

9.  Predicting Cellular Rejection With a Cell-Based Assay: Preclinical Evaluation in Children.

Authors:  Chethan Ashokkumar; Kyle Soltys; George Mazariegos; Geoffrey Bond; Brandon W Higgs; Mylarappa Ningappa; Qing Sun; Amanda Brown; Jaimie White; Samantha Levy; Tamara Fazzolare; Lisa Remaley; Katie Dirling; Patricia Harris; Tara Hartle; Pamela Kachmar; Megan Nicely; Lindsay OʼToole; Brittany Boehm; Nicole Jativa; Paula Stanley; Ronald Jaffe; Sarangarajan Ranganathan; Adriana Zeevi; Rakesh Sindhi
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Multivisceral transplantation: expanding indications and improving outcomes.

Authors:  Richard S Mangus; A Joseph Tector; Chandrashekhar A Kubal; Jonathan A Fridell; Rodrigo M Vianna
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.