Literature DB >> 19729710

Motion-induced dose artifacts in helical tomotherapy.

Bryan Kim1, Jeff Chen, Tomas Kron, Jerry Battista.   

Abstract

Tumor motion is a particular concern for a complex treatment modality such as helical tomotherapy, where couch position, gantry rotation and MLC leaf opening all change with time. In the present study, we have investigated the impact of tumor motion for helical tomotherapy, which could result in three distinct motion-induced dose artifacts, namely (1) dose rounding, (2) dose rippling and (3) IMRT leaf opening asynchronization effect. Dose rounding and dose rippling effects have been previously described, while the IMRT leaf opening asynchronization effect is a newly discovered motion-induced dose artifact. Dose rounding is the penumbral widening of a delivered dose distribution near the edges of a target volume along the direction of tumor motion. Dose rippling is a series of periodic dose peaks and valleys observed within the target region along the direction of couch motion, due to an asynchronous interplay between the couch motion and the longitudinal component of tumor motion. The IMRT leaf opening asynchronization effect is caused by an asynchronous interplay between the temporal patterns of leaf openings and tumor motion. The characteristics of each dose artifact were investigated individually as functions of target motion amplitude and period for both non-IMRT and IMRT helical tomotherapy cases, through computer simulation modeling and experimental verification. The longitudinal dose profiles generated by the simulation program agreed with the experimental data within +/-0.5% and +/-1.5% inside the PTV region for the non-IMRT and IMRT cases, respectively. The dose rounding effect produced a penumbral increase up to 20.5 mm for peak-to-peak target motion amplitudes ranging from 1.0 cm to 5.0 cm. Maximum dose rippling magnitude of 25% was calculated, when the target motion period approached an unusually high value of 10 s. The IMRT leaf opening asynchronization effect produced dose differences ranging from -29% to 7% inside the PTV region. This information on the potential motion-induced dose artifacts will be important in defining the optimal motion mitigation strategies for lung tomotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19729710     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/19/004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  A phantom model demonstration of tomotherapy dose painting delivery, including managed respiratory motion without motion management.

Authors:  Michael W Kissick; Xiaohu Mo; Keisha C McCall; Leah K Schubert; David C Westerly; Thomas R Mackie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Dosimetric evaluation of compensator intensity modulation-based stereotactic body radiotherapy for Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Y Tajima; H Nakayama; T Itonaga; S Shiraishi; M Okubo; R Mikami; S Sugahara; K Tokuuye
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  A comparison of the dosimetric effects of intrafraction motion on step-and-shoot, compensator, and helical tomotherapy-based IMRT.

Authors:  Ben J Waghorn; Robert J Staton; Justin M Rineer; Sanford L Meeks; Katja Langen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Target repositional accuracy and PTV margin verification using three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of lung cancers.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Steven Feigenberg; Jiajian Fan; Lihui Jin; Aruna Turaka; Lili Chen; C-M Charlie Ma
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Dose delivery accuracy on helical tomotherapy for 4-dimensional tumor motion - a phantom study.

Authors:  Raghavendra Holla; David Khanna; V K Sathiya Narayanan
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-06-09

6.  Investigation of probabilistic optimization for tomotherapy.

Authors:  Michael W Kissick; Thomas R Mackie; Ryan T Flynn; Xiaohu Mo; David D Campos; Yue Yan; Donghui Zhao
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  A study of longitudinal tumor motion in helical tomotherapy using a cylindrical phantom.

Authors:  Michael Klein; Stewart Gaede; Slav Yartsev
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Lung and liver SBRT using helical tomotherapy--a dosimetric comparison of fixed jaw and dynamic jaw delivery.

Authors:  Leonie Rudofsky; Eleanor Aynsley; Sebastian Beck; Kai Schubert; Gregor Habl; Sonja Krause; Jürgen Debus; Florian Sterzing
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.