Literature DB >> 19729308

Does increased postural threat lead to more conscious control of posture?

J L Huffman1, B C Horslen, M G Carpenter, A L Adkin.   

Abstract

Although it is well established that postural threat modifies postural control, little is known regarding the underlying mechanism(s) responsible for these changes. It is possible that changes in postural control under conditions of elevated postural threat result from a shift to a more conscious control of posture. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of elevated postural threat on conscious control of posture and to determine the relationship between conscious control and postural control measures. Forty-eight healthy young adults stood on a force plate at two different surface heights: ground level (LOW) and 3.2-m above ground level (HIGH). Centre of pressure measures calculated in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction were mean position (AP-MP), root mean square (AP-RMS) and mean power frequency (AP-MPF). A modified state-specific version of the Movement Specific Reinvestment Scale was used to measure conscious motor processing (CMP) and movement self-consciousness (MSC). Balance confidence, fear of falling, perceived stability, and perceived and actual anxiety indicators were also collected. A significant effect of postural threat was found for movement reinvestment as participants reported more conscious control and a greater concern about their posture at the HIGH height. Significant correlations between CMP and MSC with AP-MP were observed as participants who consciously controlled and were more concerned for their posture leaned further away from the platform edge. It is possible that changes in movement reinvestment can influence specific aspects of posture (leaning) but other aspects may be immune to these changes (amplitude and frequency).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19729308     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  32 in total

1.  Arousal, valence and their relative effects on postural control.

Authors:  Brian C Horslen; Mark G Carpenter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Can Postural Instability in Individuals with Distal Radius Fractures Be Alleviated by Concurrent Cognitive Tasks?

Authors:  Parvaneh Taghavi Azar Sharabiani; Davod Jafari; Hajar Mehdizadeh; Simon Brumagne; Mehrdad Davoudi; Farid Najd Mazhar; Siavash Rostami; Shamsi Jamali; Mohamad Parnianpour; Ghorban Taghizadeh; Kinda Khalaf
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Individuals with non-specific low back pain in an active episode demonstrate temporally altered torque responses and direction-specific enhanced muscle activity following unexpected balance perturbations.

Authors:  Stephanie L Jones; Juvena R Hitt; Michael J DeSarno; Sharon M Henry
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Attentional requirements of postural control in people with spinal cord injury: the effect of dual task.

Authors:  C M Tse; M G Carpenter; T Liu-Ambrose; A E Chisholm; T Lam
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Postural threat influences vestibular-evoked muscular responses.

Authors:  Shannon B Lim; Taylor W Cleworth; Brian C Horslen; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; J Timothy Inglis; Mark G Carpenter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The contribution of light touch sensory cues to corrective reactions during treadmill locomotion.

Authors:  Juan Forero; John E Misiaszek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Cognitively and socially induced stress affects postural control.

Authors:  Michail Doumas; Kinga Morsanyi; William R Young
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Increased human stretch reflex dynamic sensitivity with height-induced postural threat.

Authors:  Brian C Horslen; Martin Zaback; J Timothy Inglis; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Mark G Carpenter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Community-dwelling adults with a history of falling report lower perceived postural stability during a foam eyes closed test than non-fallers.

Authors:  E Anson; S Studenski; P J Sparto; Y Agrawal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  A comparison between performance on selected directions of the star excursion balance test and the Y balance test.

Authors:  Garrett F Coughlan; Karl Fullam; Eamonn Delahunt; Conor Gissane; Brian M Caulfield
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.