| Literature DB >> 19728877 |
Mikiko Takikita1, Nan Hu, Jian-Zhong Shou, Quan-Hong Wang, Carol Giffen, Philip R Taylor, Stephen M Hewitt.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cancer of the esophagus is a deadly malignancy, and development of biomarkers that predict survival is an urgent need. The apoptotic pathways have been hypothesized as important in progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We investigated a panel of proteins that regulate apoptosis as candidate of biomarkers of prognosis in ESCC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19728877 PMCID: PMC2745431 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-310
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Characteristics of patients in apoptosis biomarker protein expression tissue microarray study
| Risk factor | Prevalence of risk factor or clinicopathologic feature |
|---|---|
| Gender (male) | 0.66 |
| Age (years, median) | 58 |
| Tobacco use (yes) | 0.60 |
| Alcohol use (daily or weekly) | 0.22 |
| Family history of upper gastrointestinal cancer (yes) | 0.27 |
| Tumor grade | |
| I | 0.17 |
| II | 0.60 |
| III | 0.23 |
| IV | 0.004 |
| Tumor stage | |
| 1 | 0.004 |
| 2 | 0.13 |
| 3 | 0.86 |
| 4 | 0.01 |
| Lymph node metastasis (yes) | 0.45 |
| Degree differentiation (poor) | 0.47 |
Distribution of protein expression of the apoptotic and antiapoptotic markers, Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival by the biomarker status for ESCC patients.
| Gene protein | N1 | Distribution of protein expression by overall score (N, prevalence)2 | HR3 | Number (prevalence) with positive protein expression score4 | HR5 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | |||||||||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 12 | |||||
| 244 | 15 | 48 | 92 | 80 | 3 | 6 | --- | --- | --- | 1.10 | 9 (0.04) | 1.04 | |
| 244 | 24 | 49 | 44 | 91 | 8 | 22 | --- | 5 | 1 | 0.95 | 36 (0.15) | 0.79 | |
| 248 | 10 | 122 | 72 | 8 | 17 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1.05 | 36 (0.15) | 1.22 | |
| 247 | 190 | 48 | 9 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | 1.02 | 0 (0.00) | --- | |
| 244 | 11 | 76 | 144 | --- | 11 | 2 | --- | --- | --- | 0.92 | 13 (0.05) | 1.03 | |
| 235 | 6 | 47 | 161 | --- | 17 | 3 | --- | 1 | --- | 1.07 | 21 (0.09) | 1.36 | |
| 253 | 23 | 167 | 58 | --- | 5 | --- | --- | --- | --- | 1.01 | 5 (0.02) | 1.29 | |
1N shown is for each individual biomarker and is less than 265 total because none of 7 biomarkers had data for all 265 ESCC cases.
2Overall score calculated as (intensity score) times (percent cells positive score) as described in methods.
3HR = hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for increase in score of one category; from multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for gender, age, tobacco use, alcohol use, family history of UGI cancer, tumor grade, tumor stage, metastasis, and degree differentiation.
4Positive protein expression = overall score ≥ 4 (negative = overall score ≤ 3).
5HR = hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for positive protein expression (versus negative); from multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for gender, age, tobacco use, alcohol use, family history of UGI cancer, tumor grade, tumor stage, metastasis, and degree differentiation.
Spearman correlations between 7 apoptosis biomarkers1
| FasL | Fas | FADD | pFADD | Caspase8 | Caspase10 | Bcl2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.00 | 0.30*** | 0.16* | -0.05 | 0.15* | 0.29*** | 0.07 | |
| 1.00 | 0.10 | -0.04 | 0.18** | 0.18** | 0.00 | ||
| 1.00 | -0.05 | 0.28*** | 0.29*** | 0.08 | |||
| 1.00 | 0.01 | -0.04 | 0.03 | ||||
| 1.00 | 0.29*** | 0.03 | |||||
| 1.00 | 0.15* | ||||||
| 1.00 | |||||||
1N varies from 231 to 244 and is less than 265 total because none of 7 biomarkers had data for all 265 ESCC cases
* p < 0.05
** p < 0.01
*** p < 0.0001
Spearman correlations between 7 apoptosis biomarkers and 5 risk factors and 4 clinico-pathologic features1
| FasL | Fas | FADD | pFADD | Caspase8 | Caspase10 | Bcl2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male (yes) | 0.17** | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.02 | -0.02 | 0.03 | 0.00 |
| Age (yrs) | -0.01 | 0.02 | -0.06 | -0.05 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Tobacco use (yes) | 0.17** | 0.05 | 0.08 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.02 |
| Alcohol use (daily or weekly) | 0.00 | -0.02 | 0.20** | -0.09 | 0.13* | 0.09 | 0.02 |
| Family history UGI cancer (yes) | -0.18** | -0.15* | 0.00 | 0.04 | -0.05 | 0.02 | -0.01 |
| Tumor grade (I -- IV) | -0.10 | -0.20** | -0.18** | 0.08 | -0.07 | -0.19** | 0.02 |
| Tumor stage (1 -- 4) | 0.00 | -0.14* | -0.05 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Lymph node metastasis (yes) | 0.02 | 0.01 | -0.04 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| Degree differentiation (poor) | -0.15* | -0.26*** | -0.21** | 0.03 | -0.17** | -0.36*** | -0.30*** |
1 N varies from 235 to 253 and is less than 265 total because none of 7 biomarkers had data for all 265 ESCC cases
* p < 0.05
** p < 0.01
*** p < 0.0001
Adjusted hazard ratiosa for death by risk factors and clinico-pathologic features in ESCC cases (N = 260)
| Variable | Hazard Ratio | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male) | 1.09 | 0.70 - 1.70 | 0.69 |
| Age (years) | 1.01 | 0.99 - 1.03 | 0.28 |
| Tobacco use (yes) | 1.08 | 0.70 - 1.67 | 0.72 |
| Alcohol use (daily or weekly) | 1.00 | 0.67 -- 1.47 | 0.98 |
| Family history of UGI cancer (yes) | 1.00 | 0.72 - 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Tumor grade (I -- IV) | 1.18 | 0.90 - 1.54 | 0.24 |
| Tumor stage (1 -- 4) | 1.92 | 1.14 - 3.23 | 0.01 |
| Metastasis (yes) | 2.17 | 1.59 - 2.95 | < 0.0001 |
| Degree differentiation (poor) | 1.07 | 0.76 - 1.50 | 0.71 |
aModel includes all 9 variables shown (gender, age, tobacco use, alcohol use, family history of UGI cancer, tumor grade, tumor stage, metastasis, degree differentiation)