Literature DB >> 19728164

The social construction of copyright ethics and values.

Sheila Slaughter1, Gary Rhoades.   

Abstract

This study is based on analysis of copyright policies and 26 interviews with science and engineering faculty at three research universities on the topic of copyright beliefs, values, and practices, with emphasis on copyright of instructional materials, courseware, tools, and texts. Given that research universities now emphasize increasing external revenue flows through marketing of intellectual property, we expected copyright to follow the path of patents and lead to institutional emphasis of policies and practices that enhanced universities' intellectual property portfolios, accompanied by an increase in copyrighting by professors. Although this pattern occurred with regard to institutions, professors offered a more varied pattern, with some fully participating in commercialization of copyright and embracing entrepreneurial values, while others resisted or subverted commercial activity in favor of traditional science and engineering values.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19728164     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-009-9162-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  5 in total

1.  Making sense of scientists' responsibilities at the interface of science and society. Commentary on "Six Domains of Research Ethics".

Authors:  Vivian Weil
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers.

Authors:  Dianne M Bennett; David McD Taylor
Journal:  Emerg Med (Fremantle)       Date:  2003-06

3.  The growing complexity of international policy in intellectual property.

Authors:  Francis Gurry
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  The order of authorship: who's on first?

Authors:  D Riesenberg; G D Lundberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research.

Authors:  M A Heller; R S Eisenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.