Literature DB >> 19727805

Corresponding delay-dependent biases in spatial language and spatial memory.

John Lipinski1, John P Spencer, Larissa K Samuelson.   

Abstract

The present study addresses the relationship between linguistic and non-linguistic spatial representations. In three experiments we probe spatial language and spatial memory at the same time points in the task sequence. Experiments 1 and 2 show analogous delay-dependent biases in spatial language and spatial memory. Experiment 3 extends this correspondence, showing that additional perceptual structure along the vertical axis reduces delay-dependent effects in both tasks. These results indicate that linguistic and non-linguistic spatial systems depend on shared underlying representational processes. In addition, we also address how these delay-dependent biases can arise within a single theoretical framework without positing differing prototypes for linguistic and non-linguistic spatial systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19727805      PMCID: PMC3051274          DOI: 10.1007/s00426-009-0255-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  27 in total

Review 1.  Perceptual symbol systems.

Authors:  L W Barsalou
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Evaluation of response methods for the localization of nearby objects.

Authors:  D S Brungart; W M Rabinowitz; N I Durlach
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-01

3.  Linguistic and non-linguistic spatial categorization.

Authors:  L E Crawford; T Regier; J Huttenlocher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-06-15

4.  Spatial language and spatial representation: a cross-linguistic comparison.

Authors:  E Munnich; B Landau; B A Dosher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-10

Review 5.  Dynamic field theory of movement preparation.

Authors:  Wolfram Erlhagen; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Testing the dynamic field theory: working memory for locations becomes more spatially precise over development.

Authors:  Anne R Schutte; John P Spencer; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

7.  Prototypes and particulars: geometric and experience-dependent spatial categories.

Authors:  John P Spencer; Alycia M Hund
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-03

8.  Generalizing the dynamic field theory of the A-not-B error beyond infancy: three-year-olds' delay- and experience-dependent location memory biases.

Authors:  Anne R Schutte; John P Spencer
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr

9.  Why do categories affect stimulus judgment?

Authors:  J Huttenlocher; L V Hedges; J L Vevea
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-06

10.  Tests of the dynamic field theory and the spatial precision hypothesis: capturing a qualitative developmental transition in spatial working memory.

Authors:  Anne R Schutte; John P Spencer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  2 in total

1.  A neurobehavioral model of flexible spatial language behaviors.

Authors:  John Lipinski; Sebastian Schneegans; Yulia Sandamirskaya; John P Spencer; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Model-based functional neuroimaging using dynamic neural fields: An integrative cognitive neuroscience approach.

Authors:  Sobanawartiny Wijeakumar; Joseph P Ambrose; John P Spencer; Rodica Curtu
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.223

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.