Literature DB >> 19726896

[Comparison of quantitative results among two automated Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) assays and a manual RPR test].

Yeong Sic Kim1, Jehoon Lee, Hae Kyung Lee, Hyunjung Kim, Hi Jeong Kwon, Ki Ouk Min, Eun Joo Seo, Soo-Young Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We compared two automated Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) assay kits with a manual RPR assay kit to evaluate the possibility of using the two automated RPR assays as an alternative to the manual RPR assay for a quantitative monitoring.
METHODS: One hundred eighty-five samples were analyzed, including 16 sera from patients with primary, secondary, and latent syphilis. Measured RPR unit (R.U.) values of two automated RPR assay kits, Mediace RPR (Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd, Japan) and HBi Auto RPR (HBI Co., Ltd, Korea), were compared with the RPR titers of Macro-Vue RPR card test (Becton Dickinson BD Microbiology systems, USA). As a confirmatory test, Anti-Treponema pallidum EUROLINE WB (IgG) and Anti-Treponema pallidum EUROLINE WB (IgM) (Euroimmun, Germany) were used.
RESULTS: There was a prozone effect with Mediace RPR at RPR titer (card test) of 1:16, but not with HBi Auto RPR. The R.U. values of the two automated RPR assays did not show proportional increase to the RPR titer. Agreement between manual RPR and two automated RPR assay kits, Mediace RPR assay and HBi Auto RPR assay, were 83.8% and 83.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The two automated RPR assay kits could not be used as an alternative to manual RPR test for quantitative analysis of RPR titer. As Mediace RPR shows a prozone effect at relatively low RPR titer, caution is needed in the interpretation of the measured values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19726896     DOI: 10.3343/kjlm.2009.29.4.331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Lab Med        ISSN: 1598-6535


  5 in total

1.  Usefulness of Automated Latex Turbidimetric Rapid Plasma Reagin Test for Diagnosis and Evaluation of Treatment Response in Syphilis in Comparison with Manual Card Test: a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Motoyuki Tsuboi; Takeshi Nishijima; Takahiro Aoki; Katsuji Teruya; Yoshimi Kikuchi; Hiroyuki Gatanaga; Shinichi Oka
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Challenges of Rapid Plasma Reagin Interpretation in Syphilis Screening in Uganda: Variability in Nontreponemal Results Between Different Laboratories.

Authors:  Matthew M Hamill; Kimeze J Mbazira; Agnes N Kiragga; Charlotte A Gaydos; Mary Jett-Goheen; Rosalind Parkes-Ratanshi; Yukari C Manabe; Edith Nakku-Joloba; Anne Rompalo
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Comparison of Manual and Fully Automated AIX1000 Rapid Plasma Reagin Assays for Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis.

Authors:  Alan M Sanfilippo; Kristie Freeman; John L Schmitz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of an automated rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test with the conventional RPR card test in syphilis testing.

Authors:  Jong-Han Lee; Chae Seung Lim; Min-Geol Lee; Hyon-Suk Kim
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Comparison of automated treponemal and nontreponemal test algorithms as first-line syphilis screening assays.

Authors:  Hee Jin Huh; Jae Woo Chung; Seong Yeon Park; Seok Lae Chae
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.464

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.