Literature DB >> 19726820

Patient satisfaction is comparable to early discharge versus overnight observation after elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

Ruchira Glaser1, Zachary Gertz, William H Matthai, Robert L Wilensky, Mark Weiner, Daniel Kolansky, John Hirshfeld, Howard Herrmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous investigation has suggested that early discharge after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is feasible and safe, but these studies have utilized largely radial approaches or been conducted in non-U.S. cohorts. We sought to assess patient satisfaction, safety and cost of a strategy of selective early discharge in U.S. patients undergoing PCI via a femoral approach with contemporary adjunctive pharmacologic and hemostasis agents. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing elective PCI were prospectively recruited and randomized to either routine care, with an overnight hospital stay, versus early discharge 2 hours following successful PCI with adjunctive bivalirudin therapy and a femoral arterial closure device at the end of the procedure. The primary endpoints were safety and patient satisfaction as measured by a validated patient satisfaction survey during the index hospital stay and at 30 days. A total of 39 patients were randomized, with 20 to routine care and 19 to early discharge. There was no difference in major safety endpoints including death, non-fatal MI, urgent target lesion revascularization and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding, with none in either group. Mean patient satisfaction scores were similar and high in both groups (89.6 for early discharge patients and 90.7 for routine care patients, p = 0.68). There was lower cost in the early discharge group, with a mean cost of 8,604 USD versus 10,565 USD in the routine care group (mean difference 1,961 USD, 95% confidence interval, -96 USD to 4,017 USD).
CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing elective PCI for stable coronary artery disease may have similar safety and satisfaction with early discharge when using a careful strategy that incorporates optimal stent and hemostasis results and contemporary adjunctive anticoagulation therapy, with lower cost. This strategy may serve as a basis for a larger-scale randomized trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19726820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol        ISSN: 1042-3931            Impact factor:   2.022


  10 in total

1.  Same day discharge following transradial PCI in India: Creating value for patients and providers.

Authors:  Amit N Vora; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-04-27

Review 2.  Same day discharge after structural heart disease interventions in the era of the coronavirus-19 pandemic and beyond.

Authors:  Abdulaziz A Asbeutah; Muhammad Junaid; Fatima Hassan; Jesus Avila Vega; Nephertiti Efeovbokhan; Rami N Khouzam; Uzoma N Ibebuogu
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2022-05-26

3.  Patient satisfaction in cardiology after cardiac catheterization : Effects of treatment outcome, visit characteristics, and perception of received care.

Authors:  R R Weidemann; T Schönfelder; J Klewer; J Kugler
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Perspectives on the role of fospropofol in the monitored anesthesia care setting.

Authors:  Joseph V Pergolizzi; Tong J Gan; Stanford Plavin; Sumedha Labhsetwar; Robert Taylor
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-04-14

Review 5.  Early discharge compared with ordinary discharge after percutaneous coronary intervention - a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and cost.

Authors:  Michael Abdelnoor; Jack Gunnar Andersen; Harald Arnesen; Odd Johansen
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2017-03-20

6.  Patient preference for radial versus femoral vascular access for elective coronary procedures: The PREVAS study.

Authors:  Marlies M Kok; Marieke G M Weernink; Clemens von Birgelen; Anneloes Fens; Liefke C van der Heijden; Janine A van Til
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Regional to tertiary inter-hospital transfer versus in-house percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Delara Javat; Clare Heal; Jennifer Banks; Stefan Buchholz; Zhihua Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison short time discharge with long time discharge following uncomplicated percutaneous coronary intervention for Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction patients.

Authors:  Guozhong Wang; Quanming Zhao; Qing Cheng; Xiaoxia Zhang; Lei Tian; Xiaofan Wu
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  Safety, Feasibility and Economic Analysis of Same Day Discharge Following Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Kais Hyasat; Giuseppe Femia; Karam Alzuhairi; Andrew Ha; Joseph Kamand; Edmund Hasche; Rohan Rajaratnam; Sidney Lo; Hamid Almafragy; Kevin Liou; Joseph Chiha; Kaleab Asrress
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2022-08-23

10.  Clinical investigation of transradial access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Xuguang Qin; Weiguo Xiong; Li Wang; Enben Guan; Chunpeng Lu
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.458

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.