Literature DB >> 19726226

Nadroparin for the prevention of thromboembolic events in ambulatory patients with metastatic or locally advanced solid cancer receiving chemotherapy: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study.

Giancarlo Agnelli1, Gualberto Gussoni, Carlo Bianchini, Melina Verso, Mario Mandalà, Luigi Cavanna, Sandro Barni, Roberto Labianca, Franco Buzzi, Giovanni Scambia, Rodolfo Passalacqua, Sergio Ricci, Giampietro Gasparini, Vito Lorusso, Erminio Bonizzoni, Maurizio Tonato.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials are needed to assess the clinical benefit of antithrombotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer who are receiving chemotherapy, since these patients are at an increased risk of developing a thromboembolism. We did a trial to assess the clinical benefit of the low-molecular-weight heparin nadroparin for the prophylaxis of thromboembolic events in ambulatory patients receiving chemotherapy for metastatic or locally advanced solid cancer.
METHODS: Between October, 2003, and May, 2007, ambulatory patients with lung, gastrointestinal, pancreatic, breast, ovarian, or head and neck cancer were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive subcutaneous injections of nadroparin (3800 IU anti-Xa once a day, n=779) or placebo (n=387), in a 2:1 ratio. Study treatment was given for the duration of chemotherapy up to a maximum of 4 months. The primary study outcome was the composite of symptomatic venous or arterial thromboembolic events, as assessed by an independent adjudication committee. All randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were included in the efficacy and safety analyses (modified intention-to-treat population). The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT 00951574.
FINDINGS: 1150 patients were included in the primary efficacy and safety analyses: 769 patients in the nadroparin group and 381 patients in the placebo group. 15 (2.0%) of 769 patients treated with nadroparin and 15 (3.9%) of 381 patients treated with placebo had a thromboembolic event (single-sided p=0.02). Five (0.7%) of 769 patients in the nadroparin group and no patients in the placebo group had a major bleeding event (two-sided p=0.18). The incidences of minor bleeding were 7.4% (57 of 769) with nadroparin and 7.9% (30 of 381) with placebo. There were 121 (15.7%) serious adverse events in the nadroparin goup and 67 (17.6%) serious adverse events in the placebo group.
INTERPRETATION: Nadroparin reduces the incidence of thromboembolic events in ambulatory patients with metastatic or locally advanced cancer who are receiving chemotherapy. Future studies should focus on patients who are at a high risk for thromboembolic events. FUNDING: Italfarmaco SpA, Milan, Italy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19726226     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70232-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  164 in total

1.  A modified Khorana risk assessment score for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: the Protecht score.

Authors:  Melina Verso; Giancarlo Agnelli; Sandro Barni; Giampietro Gasparini; Roberto LaBianca
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 2.  Thrombosis and cancer.

Authors:  Annie Young; Oliver Chapman; Carole Connor; Christopher Poole; Peter Rose; Ajay K Kakkar
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Venous thromboembolism risk factors in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; Hong-Hong Yan; Jin-Ji Yang; Bin-Chao Wang; Hua-Jun Chen; Qing Zhou; Chong-Rui Xu; Ben-Yuan Jiang; Yi-Long Wu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Venous Thromboembolism Treatment and Prevention in Cancer Patients: Can We Use Pills Yet?

Authors:  Tulsi Patel; David A Iglesias
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-04-23

Review 5.  Approach to chemotherapy-associated thrombosis.

Authors:  Peter Oppelt; Anthony Betbadal; Lalitha Nayak
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 6.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for ambulatory cancer patients, can we do better?

Authors:  Hikmat Abdel-Razeq; Asem Mansour
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Venous thromboembolism risk in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy: a real-world analysis.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Laurent Eckert; Yanxin Wang; Hongwei Wang; Alexander Cohen
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-11-08

8.  Cortical blindness due to cerebral infarct in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Nivedita Nimesh; Sanjeev Kumar Verma; Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-08-01

9.  Regional lymph node metastases are a strong risk factor for venous thromboembolism: results from the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study.

Authors:  Boris Dickmann; Jonas Ahlbrecht; Cihan Ay; Daniela Dunkler; Johannes Thaler; Werner Scheithauer; Peter Quehenberger; Christoph Zielinski; Ingrid Pabinger
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 9.941

10.  Prediction and prevention of thromboembolic events with enoxaparin in cancer patients with elevated tissue factor-bearing microparticles: a randomized-controlled phase II trial (the Microtec study).

Authors:  Jeffrey I Zwicker; Howard A Liebman; Kenneth A Bauer; Thomas Caughey; Federico Campigotto; Rachel Rosovsky; Simon Mantha; Craig M Kessler; Jonathan Eneman; Vidya Raghavan; Heinz-Joseph Lenz; Andrea Bullock; Elizabeth Buchbinder; Donna Neuberg; Bruce Furie
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 6.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.