Literature DB >> 19726207

'Patients of concern' to nurses in acute care settings: a descriptive study.

Jane Cioffi1, Richard Conwayt, Leanne Everist, Janet Scott, John Senior.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nurses are required to recognise early clinical deterioration in patients and call emergency support. Nurses often use the subjective non-specific criterion, 'concerned about the patient' as the indication for calling. No study has identified cues of relevance to this criterion.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to identify cues of potential early clinical deterioration used to recognise 'a patient of concern' who is not meeting the current objective physiologic emergency response team calling criteria.
METHOD: An exploratory descriptive approach was used involving interviews with a purposive sample of 17 experienced registered nurses who recalled incidences of calling the team to adult patients based on the criterion, 'concerned about patient'. The transcribed audio tapes of interviews were coding to identify cues.
FINDINGS: Main findings are ten identified changes of concern (cues): noisy breathing, inability to talk in sentences, increasing supplemental O(2) requirements to maintain SaO(2), agitation, impaired mentation, impaired cutaneous perfusion, not expected trajectory, new or increasing pain, new symptom, and new observation that nurses used to recognise potential early clinical deterioration. Two mediating factors were also identified that influenced the decision-making process.
CONCLUSION: The ten changes of concern (cues) can be considered precursors of potential early deterioration that may assist nurses to detect patients at possible risk. Nurses are also aware that some patient groups are at higher risk as they are not able to communicate potential deterioration as perhaps other patients can. This study has only identified two patient groups and it is possible others should be considered. The availability of identified precursors indicates their validity for recognizing possible early clinical deterioration should be investigated further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19726207     DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2009.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Crit Care        ISSN: 1036-7314            Impact factor:   2.737


  4 in total

1.  'Errors' and omissions in paper-based early warning scores: the association with changes in vital signs--a database analysis.

Authors:  David A Clifton; Lei Clifton; Dona-Maria Sandu; G B Smith; Lionel Tarassenko; Sarah A Vollam; Peter J Watkinson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 2.  Nurses' worry or concern and early recognition of deteriorating patients on general wards in acute care hospitals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gooske Douw; Lisette Schoonhoven; Tineke Holwerda; Getty Huisman-de Waal; Arthur R H van Zanten; Theo van Achterberg; Johannes G van der Hoeven
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 3.  Factors influencing the activation of the rapid response system for clinically deteriorating patients by frontline ward clinicians: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wei Ling Chua; Min Ting Alicia See; Helena Legio-Quigley; Daryl Jones; Augustine Tee; Sok Ying Liaw
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.038

4.  Understanding the use of the National Early Warning Score 2 in acute care settings: a realist review protocol.

Authors:  Michelle Treacy; Geoff Wong; Mandy Odell; Nia Roberts
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.006

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.