Literature DB >> 19726143

Maturation of the human fetal startle response: evidence for sex-specific maturation of the human fetus.

Claudia Buss1, Elysia Poggi Davis, Quetzal A Class, Matt Gierczak, Carol Pattillo, Laura M Glynn, Curt A Sandman.   

Abstract

Despite the evidence for early fetal experience exerting programming influences on later neurological development and health risk, very few prospective studies of human fetal behavior have been reported. In a prospective longitudinal study, fetal nervous system maturation was serially assessed by monitoring fetal heart rate (FHR) responses to vibroacoustic stimulation (VAS) in 191 maternal/fetal dyads. Responses were not detected at 26 weeks gestational age (GA). Sex-specific, age-characteristic changes in the FHR response to VAS were observed by 31 weeks' GA. Males showed larger responses and continued to exhibit maturational changes until 37 weeks' GA, females however, presented with a mature FHR startle response by 31 weeks' GA. The results indicate that there are different rates of maturation in the male and female fetuses that may have implications for sex-specific programming influences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19726143      PMCID: PMC2767415          DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Early Hum Dev        ISSN: 0378-3782            Impact factor:   2.079


  47 in total

1.  Longitudinal study of fetal body movements: nomograms, intrafetal consistency, and relationship with episodes of heart rate patterns a and B.

Authors:  Judith Ten Hof; Ilse J M Nijhuis; Edu J H Mulder; Jan G Nijhuis; Harini Narayan; David J Taylor; Paul Westers; Gerhard H A Visser
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.756

Review 2.  Fetal behavior.

Authors:  Jan G Nijhuis
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.673

3.  Fetal response to induced maternal stress.

Authors:  Janet A DiPietro; Kathleen A Costigan; Edith D Gurewitsch
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Fetal neurobehavioral development: a tale of two cities.

Authors:  Janet A DiPietro; Laura Caulfield; Kathleen A Costigan; Mario Merialdi; Ruby H N Nguyen; Nelly Zavaleta; Edith D Gurewitsch
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2004-05

Review 5.  Regulation of the fetal heart rate and genesis of FHR patterns.

Authors:  C B Martin
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 3.300

6.  Fetal movement patterns: a possible means of defining neurologic developmental milestones in utero.

Authors:  J C Birnholz; J C Stephens; M Faria
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Influence of maternal heart rate and gross fetal body movements on the daily pattern of fetal heart rate near term.

Authors:  J Patrick; K Campbell; L Carmichael; C Probert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-11-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  The development of the brain.

Authors:  W M Cowan
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.142

9.  Maternal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal disregulation during the third trimester influences human fetal responses.

Authors:  Curt A Sandman; Laura Glynn; Pathik D Wadhwa; Aleksandra Chicz-DeMet; Manuel Porto; Tom Garite
Journal:  Dev Neurosci       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Fetal state concordance predicts infant state regulation.

Authors:  Janet A DiPietro; Kathleen A Costigan; Eva K Pressman
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  31 in total

1.  STUDIES IN FETAL BEHAVIOR: REVISITED, RENEWED, AND REIMAGINED.

Authors:  Janet A DiPietro; Kathleen A Costigan; Kristin M Voegtline
Journal:  Monogr Soc Res Child Dev       Date:  2015-09

2.  To Stroop or not to Stroop: Sex-related differences in brain-behavior associations during early childhood.

Authors:  Kimberly Cuevas; Susan D Calkins; Martha Ann Bell
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Cumulative Stress and Cortisol Disruption among Black and Hispanic Pregnant Women in an Urban Cohort.

Authors:  Shakira Franco Suglia; John Staudenmayer; Sheldon Cohen; Michelle Bosquet Enlow; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Rosalind J Wright
Journal:  Psychol Trauma       Date:  2010-12-01

Review 4.  Exposure to prenatal psychobiological stress exerts programming influences on the mother and her fetus.

Authors:  Curt A Sandman; Elysia P Davis; Claudia Buss; Laura M Glynn
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.914

Review 5.  Fetal exposure to placental corticotropin-releasing hormone (pCRH) programs developmental trajectories.

Authors:  Curt A Sandman
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 6.  Physiological reactivity to psychological stress in human pregnancy: current knowledge and future directions.

Authors:  Lisa M Christian
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 11.685

7.  Physiological reactivity of pregnant women to evoked fetal startle.

Authors:  Janet A DiPietro; Kristin M Voegtline; Kathleen A Costigan; Frank Aguirre; Katie Kivlighan; Ping Chen
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Is there a viability-vulnerability tradeoff? Sex differences in fetal programming.

Authors:  Curt A Sandman; Laura M Glynn; Elysia Poggi Davis
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  Prenatal Maternal Cortisol Has Sex-Specific Associations with Child Brain Network Properties.

Authors:  Dae-Jin Kim; Elysia Poggi Davis; Curt A Sandman; Olaf Sporns; Brian F O'Donnell; Claudia Buss; William P Hetrick
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Fetal programming of brain development: intrauterine stress and susceptibility to psychopathology.

Authors:  Claudia Buss; Sonja Entringer; Pathik D Wadhwa
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 8.192

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.