Literature DB >> 19725827

Impact of prior therapies on the relative efficacy of bortezomib compared with dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Dan T Vogl1, Edward A Stadtmauer, Paul G Richardson, Pieter Sonneveld, Michael W Schuster, David Irwin, Thierry Facon, Jean-Luc Harousseau, Anthony Boral, Rachel Neuwirth, Kenneth C Anderson.   

Abstract

This subgroup analysis of the phase III APEX (Assessment of Proteasome Inhibition for Extending Remissions) trial examined whether prior exposure to specific therapies affected the relative efficacy of bortezomib versus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory myeloma. Time to progression and overall survival were superior with bortezomib in all subgroups, with no evidence of interaction between any prior therapies and assignment to study therapy. Patients with prior thalidomide exposure had worse outcomes overall, but neither prior thalidomide nor prior autologous stem cell transplantation affected the relative efficacy of bortezomib versus dexamethasone. These results confirm the superiority of bortezomib over dexamethasone, regardless of prior exposure to specific therapies (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00048230).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19725827     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07875.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  7 in total

1.  Bortezomib plus dexamethasone for relapsed or treatment refractory multiple myeloma: the collaborative study at six institutes in Kyoto and Osaka.

Authors:  Tsutomu Kobayashi; Junya Kuroda; Kazuho Shimura; Teruaki Akaogi; Eri Kawata; Miki Kiyota; Takashi Tanaka; Yuri Kamitsuji; Satoshi Murakami; Mayumi Hatsuse; Akira Okano; Toshiki Iwai; Satomi Ueda; Masahiko Koshida; Hitoji Uchiyama; Yosuke Matsumoto; Hiroto Kaneko; Nobuhiko Uoshima; Yutaka Ueda; Yutaka Kobayashi; Chihiro Shimazaki; Shigeo Horiike; Masafumi Taniwaki
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 2.  Evidence-based mini-review: treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma previously treated with novel agents and high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation.

Authors:  Nina Shah; Sagar Lonial
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2010

3.  Arsenic Trioxide Combined with VCMP or VAD Chemotherapy in Patients with Refractory or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma in a Single Institution of China.

Authors:  Xiaoning Wang; Mei Zhang; Meihua Wang; Pengcheng He; Xin Liu; Limei Chen; Jieying Xi; Mengchang Wang; Jin Li; Huasheng Liu; Haitao Zhang
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 4.  Bortezomib in multiple myeloma: systematic review and clinical considerations.

Authors:  T C Kouroukis; F G Baldassarre; A E Haynes; K Imrie; D E Reece; M C Cheung
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 5.  Treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Pieter Sonneveld; Annemiek Broijl
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Impact of prior therapy on the efficacy and safety of oral ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs. placebo-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in TOURMALINE-MM1.

Authors:  María-Victoria Mateos; Tamas Masszi; Norbert Grzasko; Markus Hansson; Irwindeep Sandhu; Ludek Pour; Luísa Viterbo; Sharon R Jackson; Anne-Marie Stoppa; Peter Gimsing; Mehdi Hamadani; Gabriela Borsaru; Deborah Berg; Jianchang Lin; Alessandra Di Bacco; Helgi van de Velde; Paul G Richardson; Philippe Moreau
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 7.  The changing landscape of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM): fundamentals and controversies.

Authors:  José-Ángel Hernández-Rivas; Rafael Ríos-Tamayo; Cristina Encinas; Rafael Alonso; Juan-José Lahuerta
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2022-01-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.