Literature DB >> 19725700

Cortical screw purchase in synthetic and human femurs.

Rad Zdero1, Khaled Elfallah, Michael Olsen, Emil H Schemitsch.   

Abstract

Biomechanical investigations of orthopedic fracture fixation constructs increasingly use analogs like the third and fourth generation composite femurs. However, no study has directly compared cortical screw purchase between these surrogates and human femurs, which was the present aim. Synthetic and human femurs had bicortical orthopedic screws (diameter=3.5 mm and length=50 mm) inserted in three locations along the anterior length. The screws were extracted to obtain pullout force, shear stress, and energy-to-pullout. The four study groups (n=6 femurs each) assessed were the fourth generation composite femur with both 16 mm and 20 mm diameter canals, the third generation composite femur with a 16 mm canal, and the human femur. For a given femur type, there was no statistical difference between the proximal, center, or distal screw sites for virtually all comparisons. The fourth generation composite femur with a 20 mm canal was closest to the human femur for the outcome measures considered. Synthetic femurs showed a range of average measures (2948.54-5286.30 N, 27.30-35.60 MPa, and 3.63-9.95 J) above that for human femurs (1645.92-3084.95 N, 17.86-24.64 MPa, and 1.82-3.27 J). Shear stress and energy-to-pullout were useful supplemental evaluators of screw purchase, since they account for material properties and screw motion. Although synthetic femurs approximated human femurs with respect to screw extraction behavior, ongoing research is required to definitively determine which type of synthetic femur most closely resembles normal, osteopenic, or osteoporotic human bone at the screw-bone interface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19725700     DOI: 10.1115/1.3194755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  6 in total

1.  Pullout Strength After Multiple Reinsertions in Radial Bone Fixation.

Authors:  Alfonso Mejia; Giovanni Solitro; Elena Gonzalez; Amit Parekh; Mark Gonzalez; Farid Amirouche
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-09-06

Review 2.  Composite bone models in orthopaedic surgery research and education.

Authors:  John Elfar; Ron Martin Garcia Menorca; Jeffrey Douglas Reed; Spencer Stanbury
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Are quadrilateral surface buttress plates comparable to traditional forms of transverse acetabular fracture fixation?

Authors:  Brian J Kistler; Ian R Smithson; Seth A Cooper; Jacob L Cox; Aniruddh N Nayak; Brandon G Santoni; H Claude Sagi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Posterior glenoid wear in total shoulder arthroplasty: eccentric anterior reaming is superior to posterior augment.

Authors:  Tim Wang; Geoffrey D Abrams; Anthony W Behn; Derek Lindsey; Nicholas Giori; Emilie V Cheung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Biomechanical Analysis Using FEA and Experiments of Metal Plate and Bone Strut Repair of a Femur Midshaft Segmental Defect.

Authors:  Jason Coquim; Joseph Clemenzi; Mohsen Salahi; Abdurahman Sherif; Pouria Tavakkoli Avval; Suraj Shah; Emil H Schemitsch; Z Shaghayegh Bagheri; Habiba Bougherara; Radovan Zdero
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Load distribution between cephalic screws in a dual lag screw trochanteric nail.

Authors:  Julia Henschel; Sebastian Eberle; Peter Augat
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.