Literature DB >> 19725236

Sealing ability of ProRoot MTA and MTA-Angelus simulating a one-step apical barrier technique--an in vitro study.

Nikita Lolayekar1, Sham S Bhat, Sundeep Hegde.   

Abstract

Endodontic treatment of the pulpless tooth with an immature root apex poses a special challenge for the clinician due to lack of an apical stop against which to compact an interim dressing of calcium hydroxide, or the final obturation material. A one-visit apexification protocol with MTA (Mineral Trioxide Aggregate) has be seen as an alternative to the traditional treatment practices with calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)2]. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of MTA as a 5mm apical barrier by comparing sealing ability of ProRoot MTA to that of MTA-Angelus. 50 freshly extracted Maxillary and Mandibular single canal sound human incisor teeth were used in this study, which were decoronated to standardized 10mm root lengths. The root segments were prepared to simulate the clinical situation of an open apex with Gates Glidden burs # 51 and randomly assigned into 2 experimental groups of 20 samples each (Group A: ProRoot MTA, Group B: MTA-Angelus) and 10 root segments were used as control (Group C) where no apical barrier was used. After obturation the coronal portion of all samples were sealed with Glass Ionomer and stored at 37 degrees C and 100% humidity for 4 weeks. The root segments were then double coated with nail varnish except for the apical 1mm and apical ends of all root segments were suspended vertically in methylene blue dye for 48 hours at room temperature. After removal from the dye, the samples were sectioned longitudinally and linear dye penetration was measured using a Grid and stereomicroscope. The measurements were tabulated and statistically analyzed. The mean percentage of dye leakage for Group A was 55.5% and for Group B was 53.25%. The results showed no statistically significant difference in the sealing ability of ProRoot MTA and MTA-Angelus when used as apical barriers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19725236     DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.33.4.gp472416163h7818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent        ISSN: 1053-4628            Impact factor:   1.065


  6 in total

1.  Sealing ability of retrofilling materials following various root-end cavity preparation techniques.

Authors:  Mustafa Murat Koçak; Sibel Koçak; Serkan Aktuna; Jale Görücü; Sis Darendeliler Yaman
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 2.  Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA): its history, composition, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Peter Z Tawil; Derek J Duggan; Johnah C Galicia
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2015-04

3.  Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth and its effect on single visit apexification versus complete obturation using MTA and biodentine.

Authors:  Pawan Darak; Manoj Likhitkar; Shachi Goenka; Abhinav Kumar; Priyanka Madale; Ashwini Kelode
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-04-30

4.  Antimicrobial Action, Genotoxicity, and Morphological Analysis of Three Calcium Silicate-Based Cements.

Authors:  Amjad Abu Hasna; Ana Luisa Theodoro; Larissa Marques Pereira; Lucas de Paula Ramos; Tiago Moreira Bastos Campos; Maisour Ala Rachi; Talal Al-Nahalwi; Luciane Dias de Oliveira; Cláudio Antonio Talge Carvalho
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.246

5.  Assessment of antifungal activity of Proroot mineral trioxide aggregate and mineral trioxide aggregate-Angelus.

Authors:  Ali Kangarlou; Samira Sofiabadi; Saeed Asgary; Faranak Mahjour; Omid Dianat; Zahra Yadegari; Farnaz Younessian
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-05

6.  Evaluation of the dentinal wall adaptation ability of MTA Fillapex using stereo electron microscope.

Authors:  Levent Demiriz; Mustafa Murat Koçak; Sibel Koçak; Baran Can Sağlam; Sevinç Aktemur Türker
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2016 May-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.