SETTING: Urine antigen testing is an attractive strategy for the diagnosis of active tuberculosis (TB), but accuracy data are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of commercial urinary lipoarabinomannan (LAM) antigen testing for active TB among pulmonary and extra-pulmonary TB suspects. DESIGN: Prospective blinded evaluation of 200 adult TB suspects at a tertiary referral hospital in India. Reference standards included culture and clinical diagnosis. RESULTS: Patients were 61% male (mean age 40.4 years): 8.5% were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected and 47 of 200 (23.5%) were culture-positive for TB. Compared to positivity on either Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) or BACTEC cultures, LAM sensitivity was 17.8% (95%CI 8.5-32.6), while specificity was 87.7% (95%CI 81.3-92.3). Compared to positivity on both LJ and BACTEC, LAM sensitivity was 5.8% (95%CI 12.5-44.9), with a specificity of 88.8% (95%CI 82.7-92.9). Compared to the clinical diagnosis, LAM sensitivity was 20.0% (95%CI 1.1-70.1), with a specificity of 83.3% (95%CI 50.9-97.0). HIV and smear status did not influence test accuracy. CONCLUSION: In its current form, LAM is insensitive for the diagnosis of active TB, although its specificity is adequate.
SETTING: Urine antigen testing is an attractive strategy for the diagnosis of active tuberculosis (TB), but accuracy data are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of commercial urinary lipoarabinomannan (LAM) antigen testing for active TB among pulmonary and extra-pulmonary TB suspects. DESIGN: Prospective blinded evaluation of 200 adult TB suspects at a tertiary referral hospital in India. Reference standards included culture and clinical diagnosis. RESULTS:Patients were 61% male (mean age 40.4 years): 8.5% were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected and 47 of 200 (23.5%) were culture-positive for TB. Compared to positivity on either Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) or BACTEC cultures, LAM sensitivity was 17.8% (95%CI 8.5-32.6), while specificity was 87.7% (95%CI 81.3-92.3). Compared to positivity on both LJ and BACTEC, LAM sensitivity was 5.8% (95%CI 12.5-44.9), with a specificity of 88.8% (95%CI 82.7-92.9). Compared to the clinical diagnosis, LAM sensitivity was 20.0% (95%CI 1.1-70.1), with a specificity of 83.3% (95%CI 50.9-97.0). HIV and smear status did not influence test accuracy. CONCLUSION: In its current form, LAM is insensitive for the diagnosis of active TB, although its specificity is adequate.
Authors: B Hamasur; J Bruchfeld; M Haile; A Pawlowski; B Bjorvatn; G Källenius; S B Svenson Journal: J Microbiol Methods Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 2.363
Authors: Maunank Shah; Neil A Martinson; Richard E Chaisson; Desmond J Martin; Ebrahim Variava; Susan E Dorman Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Linda M Parsons; Akos Somoskövi; Cristina Gutierrez; Evan Lee; C N Paramasivan; Alash'le Abimiku; Steven Spector; Giorgio Roscigno; John Nkengasong Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Stephanie Bjerrum; Ian Schiller; Nandini Dendukuri; Mikashmi Kohli; Ruvandhi R Nathavitharana; Alice A Zwerling; Claudia M Denkinger; Karen R Steingart; Maunank Shah Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-10-21
Authors: Keertan Dheda; Virginia Davids; Laura Lenders; Teri Roberts; Richard Meldau; Daphne Ling; Laurence Brunet; Richard van Zyl Smit; Jonathan Peter; Clare Green; Motasim Badri; Leonardo Sechi; Surendra Sharma; Michael Hoelscher; Rodney Dawson; Andrew Whitelaw; Jonathan Blackburn; Madhukar Pai; Alimuddin Zumla Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Vinod B Patel; Ahmed I Bhigjee; Hoosain F Paruk; Ravesh Singh; Richard Meldau; Cathy Connolly; Thumbi Ndung'u; Keertan Dheda Journal: Cerebrospinal Fluid Res Date: 2009-11-02