Literature DB >> 19723355

Co-payments in the NHS: an analysis of the normative arguments.

Albert Weale1, Sarah Clark.   

Abstract

During 2008, some forms of patient co-payments - in particular, patients paying privately for additional medicines as part of an episode of care in the National Health Service - became controversial in political and policy terms in the UK. In response, the UK Government published a report, the Richards' Review, examining the issues. Richards offered a particular policy solution, but also touched on fundamental principles of social value. Using the methods of normative policy analysis, we seek to understand these principles of social value, accepting the Richards' framework according to which the relevant arguments can be grouped under the broad headings of equity and autonomy. None of the arguments on either side are decisive, and, in part, the policy decision turns on uncertain empirical conjectures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19723355     DOI: 10.1017/S1744133109990211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ Policy Law        ISSN: 1744-1331


  4 in total

1.  The legal imperative for treating rare disorders.

Authors:  Hanna I Hyry; Jonathan C P Roos; Jeremy Manuel; Timothy M Cox
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 4.123

2.  Cost-equivalence and Pluralism in Publicly-funded Health-care Systems.

Authors:  Dominic Wilkinson; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2018-12

Review 3.  Co-payment for Unfunded Additional Care in Publicly Funded Healthcare Systems: Ethical Issues.

Authors:  Joakim Färdow; Linus Broström; Mats Johansson
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 1.352

4.  Responsibility for Funding Refractive Correction in Publicly Funded Health Care Systems: An Ethical Analysis.

Authors:  Joakim Färdow; Linus Broström; Mats Johansson
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2020-12-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.