Literature DB >> 19723194

Hardening of high-protein nutrition bars and sugar/polyol-protein phase separation.

D J McMahon1, S L Adams, W R McManus.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Use of hydrolyzed proteins is known to delay hardening of high-protein nutrition bars. Bars were formulated using ratios of 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, or 100% partially hydrolyzed whey protein isolate (HWPI) to nonhydrolyzed whey protein isolate (WPI) in one experiment, and either WPI or HWPI combined with high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) or sorbitol syrup (SS) in a 2nd experiment along with vegetable shortening such that initial a(w) was 0.59 for HWPI bars and 0.64 for WPI bars. After mixing, the dough was extruded into bars and stored at 32 degrees C for accelerated shelf-life testing. Hardness, color, and microstructure were measured during 42 d of storage. Bars initially had similar hardness of approximately 3.4 N that increased during storage. Bars with HWPI were softest with hardness at 37 d of 10 to 15 N compared to almost 100 N for bars with WPI. Water activity increased for WPI bars to 0.69 by 34 d. Bars became darker during storage depending on amount of Maillard browning reactants, that is, HWPI/HFCS bars >> HWPI/SS > WPI/HFCS bars > WPI/SS bars. Bar microstructure at day 2 showed protein and fat dispersed in particulate form throughout the carbohydrate syrup within the bar matrix. During storage, a single nonlipid phase developed in HWPI bars while in WPI bars a phase separation occurred between protein and carbohydrate. We propose that such phase separation initiates bar hardening and promotes subsequent protein aggregation. Successful formulation of HPN bars depends on cosolvent properties of the polyol/sugar toward the proteins and their preferential exclusion from the solvation layer surrounding the proteins. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: High-protein nutrition bars can be formulated so they remain soft during storage by selecting proteins and sugars that are compatible with each other. Otherwise, the protein and sugar will separate from each other which can then lead to hardening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19723194     DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01225.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Sci        ISSN: 0022-1147            Impact factor:   3.167


  3 in total

1.  Moisture sorption curves of fruit and nut cereal bar prepared with sugar and sugar substitutes.

Authors:  Byrappa Vasu Pallavi; Ramakrishna Chetana; Ramaswamy Ravi; Sunkireddy Yella Reddy
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Pearl millet protein bar: nutritional, organoleptic, textural characterization, and in-vitro protein and starch digestibility.

Authors:  Kerenhappuch Susan Samuel; Nazni Peerkhan
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  Effect of a Snack Bar Optimized to Reduce Alcohol Bioavailability: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial in Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Joseph M Fisher; Thomas M S Wolever; Janice E Campbell; Adish Ezatagha; Jarvis C Noronha; Alexandra L Jenkins
Journal:  J Med Food       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.786

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.