Literature DB >> 19723150

Coordinated expression of ER, PR and HER2 define different prognostic subtypes among poorly differentiated breast carcinomas.

Raquel C M Fernandes1, Jose L B Bevilacqua, Ibere C Soares, Sheila A C Siqueira, Luis Pires, Roberto Hegg, Filomena M Carvalho.   

Abstract

AIMS: Histological grade is one of the most important prognostic factors in breast carcinomas, but poorly differentiated neoplasms still have quite heterogeneous biological behaviour, since they can be genetically classified as basal-like, HER2+ or even luminal. The aim was to analyse the frequency of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 expression profiles among breast carcinomas with <10% tubular formation, and their correlation with classic prognostic factors. METHODS AND
RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-four samples of paraffin-embedded tumours were studied retrospectively. The tumours were classified in to four groups by their ER/PR/HER2 profile: (i) ER+ and/or PR+ but HER2-; (ii) ER+ and/or PR+ and HER2+; (iii) ER- and/or PR- but HER2+; and (iv) ER-, PR- and HER2- (triple-negative). The histological features of triple-negative and HER2+ carcinomas overlap. The only difference was the expression of basal cytokeratins (basal CK), which was more frequent among triple-negative carcinomas. Basal-CK expression defined a more aggressive group of tumours, according to the pathological features, regardless of the immunohistochemical profile.
CONCLUSIONS: Group 1 and 2 tumours (ER+ and/or PR+ tumours with or without HER2 expression) were not statistically different, suggesting that poorly differentiated carcinomas with hormone receptors correspond to the luminal B type of tumour. Among poorly differentiated breast carcinomas, the classic profile associated with basal-CK identifies distinct subtypes equivalent to those seen by genetic classification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19723150     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03380.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  6 in total

1.  Female breast cancer status according to ER, PR and HER2 expression: a population based analysis.

Authors:  Adele Caldarella; Emanuele Crocetti; Simonetta Bianchi; Vania Vezzosi; Carmelo Urso; Mauro Biancalani; Marco Zappa
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer characterisation: correlations between the apparent diffusion coefficient and major prognostic factors.

Authors:  Paolo Belli; Melania Costantini; Enida Bufi; Giuseppe Giovanni Giardina; Pierluigi Rinaldi; Gianluca Franceschini; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Prevalence of molecular subtypes of invasive breast cancer: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Nikhilesh Kumar; Preeti Patni; A Agarwal; M A Khan; Nidhi Parashar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-06-17

4.  Evaluation of prognostic factors in stage IIA breast tumors and their correlation with mortality risk.

Authors:  Solange Torchia Carvalho; Monica Maria Stiepcich; José Humberto Fregnani; Sueli Nonogaki; Rafael Rocha; Fernando Augusto Soares
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  Distribution of breast cancer subtypes among Jordanian women and correlation with histopathological grade: molecular subclassification study.

Authors:  Maha Shomaf; Jamal Masad; Saleh Najjar; Dana Faydi
Journal:  JRSM Short Rep       Date:  2013-09-13

6.  Immunohistochemical study of nuclear ubiquitous casein and cyclin-dependent kinase substrate 1 in invasive breast carcinoma of no special type.

Authors:  Krzysztof Symonowicz; Kamila Duś-Szachniewicz; Marta Woźniak; Marek Murawski; Paweł Kołodziej; Beata Osiecka; Kamil Jurczyszyn; Piotr Ziółkowski
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.447

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.