Literature DB >> 19722420

Effects on the microbiological condition of product of decontaminating treatments routinely applied to carcasses at beef packing plants.

C O Gill1.   

Abstract

Reports on the microbiological effects of decontaminating treatments routinely applied to carcasses at beef packing plants indicate that washing before skinning may reduce the numbers of enteric bacteria transferred from the hide to meat. Washing skinned carcasses and/or dressed sides can reduce the numbers of aerobes and Escherichia coli by about 1 log unit, and pasteurizing sides with steam or hot water can reduce their numbers by > 1 or > 2 log units, respectively. Spraying with 2% lactic acid, 2% acetic acid, or 200 ppm of peroxyacetic acid can reduce the numbers of aerobes and E. coli by about 1 log, but such treatments can be ineffective if solutions are applied in inadequate quantities or to meat surfaces that are wet after washing. Trimming and vacuum cleaning with or without spraying with hot water may be largely ineffective for improving the microbiological conditions of carcasses. When contamination of meat during carcass dressing is well controlled and carcasses are subjected to effective decontaminating treatments, the numbers of E. coli on dressed carcasses can be < 1 CFU/ 1,000 cm2. However, meat can be recontaminated during carcass breaking with E. coli from detritus that persists in fixed and personal equipment. The adoption at all packing plants of the carcass-dressing procedures and decontaminating treatments used at some plants to obtain carcasses that meet a very high microbiological standard should be encouraged, and means for limiting recontamination of product during carcass breaking and for decontaminating trimmings and other beef products should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19722420     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-72.8.1790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  6 in total

1.  Induction of Shiga Toxin-Encoding Prophage by Abiotic Environmental Stress in Food.

Authors:  Yuan Fang; Ryan G Mercer; Lynn M McMullen; Michael G Gänzle
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Are Antimicrobial Interventions Associated with Heat-Resistant Escherichia coli on Meat?

Authors:  Peipei Zhang; Frances Tran; Kim Stanford; Xianqin Yang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Evidence for the benefits of food chain interventions on E. coli O157:H7/NM prevalence in retail ground beef and human disease incidence: A success story.

Authors:  Frank Pollari; Tanya Christidis; Katarina D M Pintar; Andrea Nesbitt; Jeff Farber; Marie-Claude Lavoie; Alex Gill; Penelope Kirsch; Roger P Johnson
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2017-01-01

Review 4.  A Rapid Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Slaughter and Processing Interventions to Control Non-Typhoidal Salmonella in Beef and Pork.

Authors:  Ian Young; Barbara J Wilhelm; Sarah Cahill; Rei Nakagawa; Patricia Desmarchelier; Andrijana Rajić
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.077

Review 5.  Strategies for Pathogen Biocontrol Using Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Metabolites: A Focus on Meat Ecosystems and Industrial Environments.

Authors:  Patricia Castellano; Mariana Pérez Ibarreche; Mariana Blanco Massani; Cecilia Fontana; Graciela M Vignolo
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2017-07-11

6.  Effect of a commercial steam-vacuuming treatment implemented after slaughtering for the decontamination of cattle carcasses.

Authors:  Mirjam Hochreutener; Claudio Zweifel; Sabrina Corti; Roger Stephan
Journal:  Ital J Food Saf       Date:  2017-09-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.