Literature DB >> 19720911

Prediction of local recurrence, distant metastases, and death after breast-conserving therapy in early-stage invasive breast cancer using a five-biomarker panel.

Ewan K A Millar1, Peter H Graham, Sandra A O'Toole, Catriona M McNeil, Lois Browne, Adrienne L Morey, Sarah Eggleton, Julia Beretov, Constantine Theocharous, Anne Capp, Elias Nasser, John H Kearsley, Geoff Delaney, George Papadatos, Christopher Fox, Robert L Sutherland.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical utility of intrinsic molecular phenotype after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) with lumpectomy and whole-breast irradiation with or without a cavity boost. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred ninety-eight patients with invasive breast cancer were enrolled into a randomized trial of BCT with or without a tumor bed radiation boost. Tumors were classified by intrinsic molecular phenotype as luminal A or B, HER-2, basal-like, or unclassified using a five-biomarker panel: estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, CK5/6, and epidermal growth factor receptor. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methodology were used to ascertain relationships to ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and death from breast cancer.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 84 months. Three hundred ninety-four patients were classified as luminal A, 23 were luminal B, 52 were basal, 13 were HER-2, and 16 were unclassified. There were 24 IBTR (4.8%), 35 LRR (7%), 47 distant metastases (9.4%), and 37 breast cancer deaths (7.4%). The overall 5-year disease-free rates for the whole cohort were: IBTR 97.4%, LRR 95.6%, DDFS 92.9%, and breast cancer-specific death 96.3%. A significant difference was observed for survival between subtypes for LRR (P = .012), DDFS (P = .0035), and breast cancer-specific death (P = .0482), but not for IBTR (P = .346).
CONCLUSION: The 5-year and 10-year survival rates varied according to molecular subtype. Although this approach provides additional information to predict time to IBTR, LRR, DDFS, and death from breast cancer, its predictive power is less than that of traditional pathologic indices. This information may be useful in discussing outcomes and planning management with patients after BCT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19720911     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  98 in total

1.  Triple-negative subtype predicts poor overall survival and high locoregional relapse in inflammatory breast cancer.

Authors:  Jing Li; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Pamela K Allen; Tse K Yu; Wendy A Woodward; Naoto T Ueno; Anthony Lucci; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Yun Gong; Melissa L Bondy; Wei Yang; Jie S Willey; Massimo Cristofanilli; Vicente Valero; Thomas A Buchholz
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-12-06

2.  Telomere length variation in normal epithelial cells adjacent to tumor: potential biomarker for breast cancer local recurrence.

Authors:  Xin Zhou; Alan K Meeker; Kepher H Makambi; Ourania Kosti; Bhaskar V S Kallakury; Mary K Sidawy; Christopher A Loffredo; Yun-Ling Zheng
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.944

3.  Non-sentinel axillary tumor burden applying the ACOSOG Z0011 eligibility criteria to a large routine cohort.

Authors:  Fabian Riedel; Jörg Heil; Manuel Feißt; Mahdi Rezai; Mareike Moderow; Christof Sohn; Florian Schütz; Michael Golatta; André Hennigs
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  Appropriate margin for lumpectomy excision of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrea V Barrio; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-07

5.  21-Gene recurrence score and locoregional recurrence in lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Gulisa Turashvili; Joanne F Chou; Edi Brogi; Monica Morrow; Maura Dickler; Larry Norton; Clifford Hudis; Hannah Y Wen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Breast magnetic resonance imaging: are those who need it getting it?

Authors:  S Tan; J David; L Lalonde; M El Khoury; M Labelle; R Younan; E Patocskai; J Richard; I Trop
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Inflammatory Breast Cancer at the Extremes of Age.

Authors:  Taiwo Adesoye; Oluwatowo Babayemi; Lauren M Postlewait; Sarah M DeSnyder; Susie X Sun; Wendy A Woodward; Naoto T Ueno; Kelly K Hunt; Anthony Lucci; Mediget Teshome
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Kinome-wide functional screen identifies role of PLK1 in hormone-independent, ER-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Neil E Bhola; Valerie M Jansen; Sangeeta Bafna; Jennifer M Giltnane; Justin M Balko; Mónica V Estrada; Ingrid Meszoely; Ingrid Mayer; Vandana Abramson; Fei Ye; Melinda Sanders; Teresa C Dugger; Eliezer V Allen; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Does race affect outcomes in triple negative breast cancer?

Authors:  Jasgit C Sachdev; Saira Ahmed; Muhammad M Mirza; Aamer Farooq; Lori Kronish; Mohammad Jahanzeb
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2010-05-07

10.  Prognostic Factors for Local, Loco-regional and Systemic Recurrence in Early-stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  A Kümmel; S Kümmel; J Barinoff; F Heitz; J Holtschmidt; W Weikel; F Lorenz-Salehi; A du Bois; P Harter; A Traut; J U Blohmer; B Ataseven
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.