Literature DB >> 19720355

Quantifying radiation safety and quality in medical imaging, part 2: the radiation scorecard.

Bruce I Reiner1.   

Abstract

As the utilization of medical imaging services continues to expand, so does the delivery of ionizing radiation. Although recent efforts within the medical imaging community have begun to focus on radiation dose reduction for computed tomography, very few objective data related to radiation dose are currently being prospectively collected, tracked, or analyzed. Without a comprehensive program aimed at objective and reproducible radiation data analysis, ongoing efforts at dose optimization will, in all likelihood, remain marginalized. The proposed radiation scorecard provides an analysis of events within the imaging chain, attempts to involve all stakeholders, and addresses the various technologies being utilized. The combined data can in turn be used for education and training, certification, research, development of best practice guidelines, and new technology development.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19720355     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  6 in total

1.  Application of innovation economics to medical imaging and information systems technologies.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Matthew McKinley
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Nuclear medicine: what kind of quality would we want if we were the patient?

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani; Angelo Del Sole
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Improving healthcare delivery through patient informatics and quality centric data.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Innovating through measurement.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Creating accountability in image quality analysis. Part 2: medical imaging accreditation.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 6.  Transforming health care service delivery and provider selection.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.056

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.