Literature DB >> 19719818

High or low current threshold for nerve stimulation for regional anaesthesia.

T Steinfeldt1, J Graf, T Vassiliou, A Morin, K Feldmann, W Nimphius, J De Andres, H Wulf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the application of high stimulation current thresholds (SCT) leads to a distant needle to nerve proximity (NNP) compared with low SCT during nerve localization for regional anaesthesia in pigs.
METHODS: A minimal motor response to the stimulation of femoral or brachial plexus nerves in 16 anaesthetized pigs was triggered either by a minimal SCT of a low (0.01-0.3 mA) or a high (0.8-1.0 mA) current in a random order. After eliciting a motor response with a predetermined SCT, synthetic resin was injected via the needle. After postmortem dissection of the injection site, the localization of the resin deposition was determined verifying the final position of the needle tip. Depending on the proximity of resin deposition to the nerve epineurium, the needle tip placement was considered either as a close or a distant NNP.
RESULTS: A total of 235 punctures were performed. Ninety-one punctures were carried out with low SCT and 92 with a high SCT. Fifty-two punctures served as a control (1.8-2.0 mA). All injectates following both high or low SCT were considered 'close needle tip to nerve placement', whereas 27 of 52 injectates of the control group appeared distant to nerve epineurium.
CONCLUSION: Regardless of the applied SCT, i.e. high or low, all resin deposition was found adjacent to nerve epineurium. These findings suggest that high and low SCT result in equivalent needle tip localization in pigs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19719818     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02087.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  5 in total

1.  [Primum nil nocere. Regional anesthesia in neurologic diseases].

Authors:  J Büttner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  [Localization of peripheral nerves. Success and safety with electrical nerve stimulation].

Authors:  M Neuburger; U Schwemmer; T Volk; W Gogarten; P Kessler; T Steinfeldt
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  The role of electrical stimulation in ultrasound-guided subgluteal sciatic nerve block: a retrospective study on how response pattern and minimal evoked current affect the resultant blockade.

Authors:  Kaoru Hara; Shinichi Sakura; Naomi Yokokawa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Histological Consequences of Needle-Nerve Contact following Nerve Stimulation in a Pig Model.

Authors:  T Steinfeldt; J Graf; J Schneider; W Nimphius; E Weihe; A Borgeat; H Wulf; T Wiesmann
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-04-19

5.  A Swiss nationwide survey shows that dual guidance is the preferred approach for peripheral nerve blocks.

Authors:  Markus M Luedi; Vanessa Upadek; Andreas P Vogt; Thorsten Steinfeldt; Urs Eichenberger; Axel R Sauter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.