Literature DB >> 19718745

Electromyographic facial nerve monitoring during parotidectomy for benign lesions does not improve the outcome of postoperative facial nerve function: a prospective two-center trial.

Maria Grosheva1, Jens Peter Klussmann, Carolin Grimminger, Claus Wittekindt, Dirk Beutner, Mira Pantel, Gerd Fabian Volk, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To analyze the benefit of electromyographic (EMG) neuromonitoring during primary surgery on benign parotid lesions for postoperative facial function compared to visual observation only. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective controlled clinical two-center trial.
METHODS: Using an operation microscope, 100 parotidectomies in 96 patients were performed: 50 procedures with a continuous EMG monitoring plus visual facial observation (EMG group), and 50 procedures with only visual facial control (control group). The rate of postoperative facial weakness was detected. Patients with postoperative facial paralysis were followed up until total recovery or defective healing by repeated EMG examinations.
RESULTS: Seventy-nine superficial and 21 total parotidectomies were performed. Histological analysis found pleomorphic adenoma in 38 patients, cystadenolymphoma in 39, and chronic parotitis in 18. Immediate postoperative facial paralysis was evident in 41 patients. Six patients had permanent paralysis; in this group definitive defective healing was detected by EMG in five cases. EMG was not classifiable in one case. Intraoperative EMG monitoring had no significant effect on immediate postoperative or definitive facial outcome (P =.23 and P = .45, respectively). The duration of superficial, but not of a total parotidectomy, was diminished in the EMG group (P = .02 and P = .61, respectively). This result was independent of the specimen's histology.
CONCLUSIONS: EMG monitoring in parotid surgery in addition to visual facial observation did not diminish either the incidence of postoperative facial paralysis or the final facial outcome. Nevertheless, the duration of surgery for superficial parotidectomy could be reduced by using EMG monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19718745     DOI: 10.1002/lary.20637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  16 in total

1.  Facial nerve dysfunction after superficial parotidectomy with or without continuous intraoperative electromyographic neuromonitoring: a prospective randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Agnaldo J Graciano; Carlos A Fischer; Guilherme V Coelho; José H Steck; Jorge R Paschoal; Carlos T Chone
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The effect of partial superficial parotidectomy on amplitude, latency and threshold of facial nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Kerem Ozturk; Serdar Akyildiz; Sercan Gode; Goksel Turhal; Gulce Gursan; Tayfun Kirazli
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Outcome of Postoperative Facial Nerve Function Following Electromyographic Facial Nerve Monitoring During Parotidectomy for Benign Lesions: a Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Roshan Verma; Gontu Gopi Satya Sai Reddy; B Pavan Kumar; Jaimanti Bakshi
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-21

4.  Pattern of facial nerve palsy during parotidectomy: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Abdulwahid M Salih; Hiwa O Baba; Yadgar A Saeed; Aso S Muhialdeen; Fahmi H Kakamad; Shvan H Mohammed; Zuhair D Hammood; Karzan M Salih; Rawezh Q Salih; Dahat A Hussein; Hunar A Hassan
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.573

5.  Posterior auricular artery as a novel anatomic landmark for identification of the facial nerve: A clinical study.

Authors:  Muyuan Liu; Litian Tong; Manbin Xu; Xiang Xu; Haipeng Guo; Shaowei Xu; Hanwei Peng
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-09-09

Review 6.  Facial nerve monitoring during parotid gland surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carlos Miguel Chiesa-Estomba; Ekhiñe Larruscain-Sarasola; Jérome Rene Lechien; Francois Mouawad; Christian Calvo-Henriquez; Evelyne Siga Diom; Adonis Ramirez; Tareck Ayad
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Intraoperative facial nerve monitoring during cochlear implant surgery: an observational study.

Authors:  Hui-Shan Hsieh; Che-Ming Wu; Ming-Ying Zhuo; Chao-Hui Yang; Chung-Feng Hwang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Facial Nerve Monitoring During Parotidectomy:A Two-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Stanislas Ballivet-de Régloix; Julia Grinholtz-Haddad; Olga Maurin; Louise Genestier; Quentin Lisan; Yoann Pons
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07

Review 9.  A systematic recurrent theme analysis of the reported limitations of facial electromyography.

Authors:  L Geoghegan; R M Kwasnicki; S Kanabar; D Pethers; C Nduka
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-07-11

10.  Safety of the "Saxophone®" electrode in parotid surgery for continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring of the facial nerve: results of a pro- and retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Petar Stankovic; Jan Wittlinger; Robert Georgiew; Nina Dominas; Katrin Reimann; Stephan Hoch; Thomas Wilhelm; Thomas Günzel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.