Literature DB >> 19717944

[Relationship of flatfoot and high arch with main anthropometric variables].

Derya Atamturk1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The deformities of flatfoot (pes planus) and high arch (pes cavus) are serious health problems causing gait and postural defects in all age groups. The aim of this study was to seek relationships of these two deformities with main anthropometric variables in adults.
METHODS: This study was carried out in 516 community individuals (253 males, 263 females) aged between 18 to 83 years, living in Ankara, Turkey. The mean age was 40.5+/-13.4 years in males, and 43.3+/-14.9 years in females. The participants were analyzed in five age brackets, namely 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and = or > 60 years. The presence of flatfoot or high arch was determined by the analysis of footprints. A total of five anthropometric variables were measured including body weight, body height, foot length, metatarsal width, and heel width. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated and shoe size of the individuals was recorded, as well.
RESULTS: The incidences of flatfoot and high arch were 4.1% (n=21) and 1.2% (n=6), respectively. There were no significant differences between sex and age groups with respect to the frequency of both deformities (p>0.05). No associations were found between the presence of flatfoot or high arch and body weight, body height, BMI, foot length, metatarsal width, and shoe size (p>0.05). Only heel width showed a significant association with the presence of flatfoot (p=0.027).
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the presence of high arch is not related to body composition and foot dimensions, while flatfoot is associated only with heel width.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19717944     DOI: 10.3944/AOTT.2009.254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc        ISSN: 1017-995X            Impact factor:   1.511


  5 in total

1.  Dendrogram for Anthropometric and Biomechanical Variables Causing Foot Deformities by Using Hierarchical Cluster Analysis: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Başar Öztürk; Yusuf Çelik
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2022-04-04

2.  Validity of footprint analysis to determine flatfoot using clinical diagnosis as the gold standard in a random sample aged 40 years and older.

Authors:  Salvador Pita-Fernández; Cristina González-Martín; Teresa Seoane-Pillado; Beatriz López-Calviño; Sonia Pértega-Díaz; Vicente Gil-Guillén
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 3.211

3.  Variability between Clarke's angle and Chippaux-Smirak index for the diagnosis of flat feet.

Authors:  Cristina Gonzalez-Martin; Salvador Pita-Fernandez; Teresa Seoane-Pillado; Beatriz Lopez-Calviño; Sonia Pertega-Diaz; Vicente Gil-Guillen
Journal:  Colomb Med (Cali)       Date:  2017-03-30

4.  Prevalence of flatfoot among school students and its relationship with BMI.

Authors:  Mohsen Pourghasem; Nematollah Kamali; Mehrdad Farsi; Nabiollah Soltanpour
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 1.511

5.  Immediate and short-term radiological changes after combining static stretching and transcutaneous electrical stimulation in adults with cavus foot: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lourdes María Fernández-Seguín; Alberto Marcos Heredia-Rizo; Juan Antonio Díaz-Mancha; Paula González-García; Javier Ramos-Ortega; Pedro V Munuera-Martínez
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.