Literature DB >> 19717889

The quantification of dynamic FET PET imaging and correlation with the clinical outcome in patients with glioblastoma.

Frank Thiele1, Julia Ehmer, Marc D Piroth, Michael J Eble, Heinz H Coenen, Hans-Juergen Kaiser, Wolfgang M Schaefer, Ulrich Buell, Christian Boy.   

Abstract

The PET tracer O-(2-[18F]Fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (FET) has been shown to be valuable for different roles in the management of brain tumours. The aim of this study was to evaluate several quantitative measures of dynamic FET PET imaging in patients with resected glioblastoma. We evaluated dynamic FET PET in nine patients with histologically confirmed glioblastoma. Following FET PET, all subjects had radiation and chemotherapy. Tumour ROIs were defined by a threshold-based region-growing algorithm. We compared several standard measures of tumour uptake and uptake kinetics: SUV, SUV/background, distribution volume ratio (DVR), weighted frame differences and compartment model parameters. These measures were correlated with disease-free and overall survival, and analysed for statistical significance. We found that several measures allowed robust quantification. SUV and distribution volume did not correlate with clinical outcome. Measures that are based on a background region (SUV/BG, Logan-DVR) highly correlated with disease-free survival (r = -0.95, p < 0.0001), but not overall survival. Some advanced measures also showed a prognostic value but no improvement over the simpler methods. We conclude that FET PET probably has a prognostic value in patients with resected glioblastoma. The ratio of SUV to background may provide a simple and valuable predictive measure of the clinical outcome. Further studies are needed to confirm these explorative results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19717889     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/18/012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  19 in total

1.  MRI-suspected low-grade glioma: is there a need to perform dynamic FET PET?

Authors:  Nathalie L Jansen; Vera Graute; Lena Armbruster; Bogdana Suchorska; Juergen Lutz; Sabina Eigenbrod; Paul Cumming; Peter Bartenstein; Jörg-Christian Tonn; Friedrich Wilhelm Kreth; Christian la Fougère
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Integrated analysis of dynamic FET PET/CT parameters, histology, and methylation profiling of 44 gliomas.

Authors:  Manuel Röhrich; Kristin Huang; Daniel Schrimpf; Nathalie L Albert; Thomas Hielscher; Andreas von Deimling; Ulrich Schüller; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; Uwe Haberkorn
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Response to "reply to [18F]-fluoro-ethyl-L-tyrosine PET: a valuable diagnostic tool in neuro-oncology, but not all that glitters is glioma" by Hutterer et al.

Authors:  Markus Hutterer; Martha Nowosielski; Daniel Putzer; Christian la Fougère; Irene J Virgolini; Andreas H Jacobs; Günther Stockhammer
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Comparison of visual and semiquantitative analysis of 18F-FDOPA-PET/CT for recurrence detection in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Ken Herrmann; Johannes Czernin; Timothy Cloughesy; Albert Lai; Kelsey L Pomykala; Matthias R Benz; Andreas K Buck; Michael E Phelps; Wei Chen
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  Metabolic positron emission tomography imaging in cancer detection and therapy response.

Authors:  Aizhi Zhu; Daniel Lee; Hyunsuk Shim
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  Prediction of glioma recurrence using dynamic ¹⁸F-fluoroethyltyrosine PET.

Authors:  T Pyka; J Gempt; F Ringel; S Hüttinger; S van Marwick; S Nekolla; H-J Wester; M Schwaiger; S Förster
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Intra-lesional spatial correlation of static and dynamic FET-PET parameters with MRI-based cerebral blood volume in patients with untreated glioma.

Authors:  Jens Göttler; Mathias Lukas; Anne Kluge; Stephan Kaczmarz; Jens Gempt; Florian Ringel; Mona Mustafa; Bernhard Meyer; Claus Zimmer; Markus Schwaiger; Stefan Förster; Christine Preibisch; Thomas Pyka
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Differential Spatial Distribution of TSPO or Amino Acid PET Signal and MRI Contrast Enhancement in Gliomas.

Authors:  Lena Kaiser; Adrien Holzgreve; Stefanie Quach; Michael Ingrisch; Marcus Unterrainer; Franziska J Dekorsy; Simon Lindner; Viktoria Ruf; Julia Brosch-Lenz; Astrid Delker; Guido Böning; Bogdana Suchorska; Maximilian Niyazi; Christian H Wetzel; Markus J Riemenschneider; Sophia Stöcklein; Matthias Brendel; Rainer Rupprecht; Niklas Thon; Louisa von Baumgarten; Jörg-Christian Tonn; Peter Bartenstein; Sibylle Ziegler; Nathalie L Albert
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 9.  Current molecular imaging positron emitting radiotracers in oncology.

Authors:  Aizhi Zhu; Hyunsuk Shim
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-02-01

10.  The Clinical Value of PET with Amino Acid Tracers for Gliomas WHO Grade II.

Authors:  Anja Smits; Brigitta G Baumert
Journal:  Int J Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.