OBJECTIVE: Spatio and/or temporal surveillance systems are designed to monitor the ongoing appearance of disease cases in space and time, and to detect potential disturbances in either dimension. Patient addresses are sometimes reported at some level of geographic aggregation, for example by ZIP code or census tract. While this aggregation has the advantage of protecting patient privacy, it also risks compromising statistical efficiency. This paper investigated the variation in power to detect a change in the spatial distribution in the presence of spatial aggregation. METHODS: The authors generated 400,000 spatial datasets with varying location and spread of simulated spatial disturbances, both on a purely synthetic uniform population, and on a heterogeneous population, representing hospital admissions to three community hospitals in Cape Cod, Massachusetts. The authors evaluated the power of the M-statistic to detect spatial disturbances, comparing the use of exact spatial locations versus twelve different levels of aggregation, where the M-statistic is a comparison of two distributions of interpoint distances between locations. RESULTS: When the spread of simulated spatial disturbances was contained to a small portion of the study region or affects a large proportion of the population at risk, power was highest when exact locations were reported. If the spatial disturbance was a more modest signal, the best power was attained at an aggregated level. CONCLUSIONS: The precision at which patients' locations are reported has the potential to affect the power of detection significantly.
OBJECTIVE: Spatio and/or temporal surveillance systems are designed to monitor the ongoing appearance of disease cases in space and time, and to detect potential disturbances in either dimension. Patient addresses are sometimes reported at some level of geographic aggregation, for example by ZIP code or census tract. While this aggregation has the advantage of protecting patient privacy, it also risks compromising statistical efficiency. This paper investigated the variation in power to detect a change in the spatial distribution in the presence of spatial aggregation. METHODS: The authors generated 400,000 spatial datasets with varying location and spread of simulated spatial disturbances, both on a purely synthetic uniform population, and on a heterogeneous population, representing hospital admissions to three community hospitals in Cape Cod, Massachusetts. The authors evaluated the power of the M-statistic to detect spatial disturbances, comparing the use of exact spatial locations versus twelve different levels of aggregation, where the M-statistic is a comparison of two distributions of interpoint distances between locations. RESULTS: When the spread of simulated spatial disturbances was contained to a small portion of the study region or affects a large proportion of the population at risk, power was highest when exact locations were reported. If the spatial disturbance was a more modest signal, the best power was attained at an aggregated level. CONCLUSIONS: The precision at which patients' locations are reported has the potential to affect the power of detection significantly.
Authors: M Meselson; J Guillemin; M Hugh-Jones; A Langmuir; I Popova; A Shelokov; O Yampolskaya Journal: Science Date: 1994-11-18 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: T W Hennessy; C W Hedberg; L Slutsker; K E White; J M Besser-Wiek; M E Moen; J Feldman; W W Coleman; L M Edmonson; K L MacDonald; M T Osterholm Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-05-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Aline Guttmann; Xinran Li; Jean Gaudart; Yan Gérard; Jacques Demongeot; Jean-Yves Boire; Lemlih Ouchchane Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2014-05-27 Impact factor: 3.918