Literature DB >> 19717654

Direct magnitude estimation of articulation rate in boys with fragile X syndrome.

David J Zajac1, Adrianne A Harris, Joanne E Roberts, Gary E Martin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the perceived articulation rate of boys with fragile X syndrome (FXS) with that of chronologically age-matched (CA) boys and to determine segmental and/or prosodic factors that account for perceived rate.
METHOD: Ten listeners used direct magnitude estimation procedures to judge the articulation rates of 7 boys with FXS only, 5 boys with FXS and a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and 12 CA boys during sentence repetition. Sentences had similar articulation rates in syllables per second as determined acoustically. Four segmental/prosodic factors were used to predict perceived rate: (a) percentage consonants correct, (b) overall fundamental frequency (F(0)) level, (c) sentence-final F(0) drop, and (d) acoustically determined articulation rate with the final word of the sentence excluded.
RESULTS: Boys with FXS and ASD were judged to talk faster than CA controls. Multiple linear regression indicated that articulation rate with the final word of the sentence excluded and sentence-final F(0) drop accounted for 91% of the variance for perceived rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Descriptions of speakers with FXS as having fast and/or fluctuating articulation rates may be influenced by autism status. Also, atypical sentence-final prosody may be related to perceived rate in boys with FXS and ASD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19717654      PMCID: PMC2858968          DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0208)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  27 in total

1.  A comparison of equal-appearing interval scaling and direct magnitude estimation of nasal voice quality.

Authors:  R I Zraick; J M Liss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Prosody and its relationship to language in school-aged children with high-functioning autism.

Authors:  Joanne McCann; Susan Peppé; Fiona E Gibbon; Anne O'Hare; Marion Rutherford
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  A comparison of phonological skills of boys with fragile X syndrome and Down syndrome.

Authors:  Joanne Roberts; Steven H Long; Cheryl Malkin; Elizabeth Barnes; Martie Skinner; Elizabeth A Hennon; Kathleen Anderson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 4.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Prevalence of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  G Turner; T Webb; S Wake; H Robinson
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1996-07-12

6.  Articulation rate and vowel space characteristics of young males with fragile X syndrome: preliminary acoustic findings.

Authors:  David J Zajac; Joanne E Roberts; Elizabeth A Hennon; Adrianne A Harris; Elizabeth F Barnes; Jan Misenheimer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Autistic features, personality, and adaptive behavior in males with the fragile X syndrome and no autism.

Authors:  D S Kerby; B L Dawson
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  1994-01

8.  Compulsive, self-injurious, and autistic behavior in children and adolescents with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Scott S Hall; Amy A Lightbody; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  2008-01

Review 9.  Lessons from fragile X regarding neurobiology, autism, and neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Randi J Hagerman
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.225

10.  Breath-group intelligibility in dysarthria: characteristics and underlying correlates.

Authors:  Yana Yunusova; Gary Weismer; Ray D Kent; Nicole M Rusche
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  6 in total

1.  A comparison of pragmatic language in boys with autism and fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Jessica Klusek; Gary E Martin; Molly Losh
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Exploring the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata as a novel animal model for the speech-language deficit of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Claudia Winograd; Stephanie Ceman
Journal:  Results Probl Cell Differ       Date:  2012

3.  Inferential language use by youth with Down syndrome during narration.

Authors:  Shealyn A Ashby; Marie Moore Channell; Leonard Abbeduto
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2017-10-13

Review 4.  Public Health Literature Review of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Melissa Raspa; Anne C Wheeler; Catharine Riley
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Point vowel duration in children with hearing aids and cochlear implants at 4 and 5 years of age.

Authors:  Mark VanDam; Dana Ide-Helvie; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 1.346

6.  Physiological arousal in autism and fragile X syndrome: group comparisons and links with pragmatic language.

Authors:  Jessica Klusek; Gary E Martin; Molly Losh
Journal:  Am J Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2013-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.