AIMS: The aim of the work presented here was to explore differences between pet owners and non-pet-owners concerning aspects of health, physical/leisure activities, work and socio-demographics. METHODS: The study was based on nationally representative data from the Swedish population (n = 43,589). Associations between pet ownership and background variables were investigated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 39,995 respondents were included in the analysis (non-pet-owners = 25,006; pet owners = 14,989). Pet ownership was associated with both positive and negative aspects of health, physical/leisure activities and socio-demographics. Pet owners had better general health but suffered more from mental health problems than non-pet-owners. Their leisure activities involved a greater interest in nature life and/or gardening than those of non-pet-owners. The logistic regression analysis showed that people who were self-employed, in the age range 35 to 49, of female sex, and suffering from pain in the head, neck and shoulders were more likely to own a pet than others. People physically active at a level sufficient to have a positive effect on their health more often owned a pet than people who were less active. CONCLUSIONS: Pet owners differ from non-pet-owners in aspects of socio-demographics, health, physical/leisure activities and work situation. This study, based on a general regional population in Sweden, showed differences of both a positive and a negative kind between non-pet-owners and pet owners concerning aspects of health, physical and leisure activities, and work situation.
AIMS: The aim of the work presented here was to explore differences between pet owners and non-pet-owners concerning aspects of health, physical/leisure activities, work and socio-demographics. METHODS: The study was based on nationally representative data from the Swedish population (n = 43,589). Associations between pet ownership and background variables were investigated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 39,995 respondents were included in the analysis (non-pet-owners = 25,006; pet owners = 14,989). Pet ownership was associated with both positive and negative aspects of health, physical/leisure activities and socio-demographics. Pet owners had better general health but suffered more from mental health problems than non-pet-owners. Their leisure activities involved a greater interest in nature life and/or gardening than those of non-pet-owners. The logistic regression analysis showed that people who were self-employed, in the age range 35 to 49, of female sex, and suffering from pain in the head, neck and shoulders were more likely to own a pet than others. People physically active at a level sufficient to have a positive effect on their health more often owned a pet than people who were less active. CONCLUSIONS: Pet owners differ from non-pet-owners in aspects of socio-demographics, health, physical/leisure activities and work situation. This study, based on a general regional population in Sweden, showed differences of both a positive and a negative kind between non-pet-owners and pet owners concerning aspects of health, physical and leisure activities, and work situation.
Authors: Carri Westgarth; Jon Heron; Andy R Ness; Peter Bundred; Rosalind M Gaskell; Karen P Coyne; Alexander J German; Sandra McCune; Susan Dawson Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Mwenya Mubanga; Liisa Byberg; Agneta Egenvall; Johan Sundström; Patrik Karl Erik Magnusson; Erik Ingelsson; Tove Fall Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Rebecca Purewal; Robert Christley; Katarzyna Kordas; Carol Joinson; Kerstin Meints; Nancy Gee; Carri Westgarth Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Johanna Lass-Hennemann; Sarah K Schäfer; M Roxanne Sopp; Tanja Michael Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-08 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Katherine M Crawford; Yiwen Zhu; Kathryn A Davis; Samantha Ernst; Kristina Jacobsson; Kristen Nishimi; Andrew D A C Smith; Erin C Dunn Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Mwenya Mubanga; Liisa Byberg; Christoph Nowak; Agneta Egenvall; Patrik K Magnusson; Erik Ingelsson; Tove Fall Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 4.379