Literature DB >> 19717346

Poor outcomes after endovascular treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: time for a moratorium.

Peter M Rothwell.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19717346     DOI： 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70230-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Neurol        ISSN： 1474-4422            Impact factor:   44.182


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Plea of the defence-critical comments on the interpretation of EVA3S, SPACE and ICSS.

Authors:  Jens Fiehler; Søren Jacob Bakke; Andrew Clifton; Emmanuel Houdart; Olav Jansen; Daniel Rüfenacht; Michael Söderman; Christophe Cognard
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  On limitations of studies and limitations of therapy options for carotid stenosis: why play golf with only a sand wedge?

Authors:  Jens Fiehler
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Stroke: Carotid stenosis--surgery or stenting to prevent stroke?

Authors:  Peter Sandercock
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 4.  Treatment of carotid artery disease: endarterectomy or angioplasty?

Authors:  Adrian Marchidann; Randolph S Marshall
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.081

5.  Plaque morphology detected with Duplex ultrasound before carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is not a predictor of carotid artery in-stent restenosis, a case control study.

Authors:  Katrin Wasser; André Karch; Sonja Gröschel; Janin Witzenhausen; Klaus Gröschel; Mathias Bähr; Jan Liman
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 2.474
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.