Literature DB >> 19717336

Acoustic, mechanical and galvanic stimulation modes elicit ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials.

Po-Wen Cheng1, Chien-Cheng Chen, Shou-Jen Wang, Yi-Ho Young.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the characteristic parameters of ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs) elicited by the air-conducted sound (ACS) and bone-conducted vibration (BCV) stimulation modes as well as the galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) mode.
DESIGN: Fifteen healthy subjects underwent oVEMP tests using ACS (127 dBSPL), BCV (142dB force level), and GVS (5mA) modes. The response rate, latencies of nI and pI, nI-pI interval and amplitude were measured for each mode and compared among modes.
RESULTS: All 15 healthy subjects (30 ears) had 100% response rates in both BCV- and GVS-oVEMPs, exhibiting a response rate significantly higher than 80% in ACS-oVEMPs. The mean nI latency was the shortest in the GVS mode, followed by BCV and then ACS modes. The variation among the latencies of the three modes was significant. Likewise, the mean nI-pI amplitudes in ACS-, BCV- and GVS modes varied significantly. However, the mean nI-pI interval did not differ significantly among the three modes.
CONCLUSIONS: Among the ACS (127 dBSPL), BCV (142dB force level), and GVS (5mA) modes, the BCV mode yields a 100% response rate and the largest nI-pI amplitude of oVEMPs. SIGNIFICANCE: The oVEMPs in ACS and GVS modes may help to differentiate the saccular from the retro-saccular lesions. If ACS-oVEMPs are normal, then oVEMPs in BCV and GVS modes can distinguish between utricular and retro-utricular disorders. Restated, oVEMPs in ACS, BCV, and GVS modes may promote the topographical delineation of the lesion site of the otolithic-ocular reflex pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19717336     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  9 in total

1.  Differentiating cerebellar and brainstem lesions with ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential test.

Authors:  Chia-Hung Su; Yi-Ho Young
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Air-Conducted Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: Thresholds, Frequency Tuning, and Effects of Sound Exposure.

Authors:  Amanda I Rodriguez; Megan L A Thomas; Kristen L Janky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials using air-conducted sound: test parameters and normative data in healthy children; effect of body position on threshold.

Authors:  Ioannis Kastanioudakis; Panagiotis Saravakos; Theodoros Leontis; Dimitrios G Balatsouras; Nausica Ziavra
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Effects of age on the tuning of the cVEMP and oVEMP.

Authors:  Erin G Piker; Gary P Jacobson; Robert F Burkard; Devin L McCaslin; Linda J Hood
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 5.  Vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in central vestibular disorders.

Authors:  Sun-Young Oh; Hyo-Jeong Kim; Ji-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Direction-dependent excitatory and inhibitory ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMP) produced by oppositely directed accelerations along the midsagittal axis of the head [corrected].

Authors:  Peter Jombik; Pavel Spodniak; Vladimír Bahyl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Age Effects of Bone Conduction Vibration Vestibular-evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMPs) Using B81 and Impulse Hammer Stimuli.

Authors:  Jessie N Patterson; Amanda I Rodriguez; Katherine R Gordon; Julie A Honaker; Kristen L Janky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  Galvanic vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: normative data and the effect of age.

Authors:  Nizamettin Burak Avcı; Zahra Polat; Ahmet Ataş
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-17

9.  Vestibular Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic and Electric Stimulation Effects on Human Subjective Visual Vertical Perception.

Authors:  Nicolas Bouisset; Sébastien Villard; Alexandre Legros
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 1.848

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.