Literature DB >> 19717253

Ballistic parameters of cal. 9 mm x 17 mm industrial blank cartridges (cattle cartridges).

M Frank1, E Franke, K P Philipp, B Bockholdt, A Ekkernkamp.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cal. 9 mm x 17 mm industrial blank cartridges deserve special interest in the field of forensic ballistic. This calibre is most often used in Kerner-type livestock stunners, but also in different power tools. The legal framework of these industrial blank cartridges is provided by the C.I.P. and DIN 7260 regulations. The aim of this investigation is to describe and compare two experimental test procedures for measurement of maximum gas pressure and kinetic energy of cal. 9 mm x 17 mm industrial blank cartridges according to standardized C.I.P. and DIN 7260 protocols and to provide these ballistic data.
METHODS: Using two different pressure measurement barrels and standardized test projectiles, the maximum gas pressure and the kinetic energy of the test projectiles are investigated. While the pressure take-off point in C.I.P. protocol is at the cartridge mouth, the DIN 7260 protocol is modified using a pressure take-off point in the cartridge chamber. For each test protocol (C.I.P. and DIN), maximum gas pressure, velocity, impulse and energy of the test projectiles are measured. Each ten cartridges from the same ammunition lot of four different energy levels (red, blue, yellow, green) are investigated.
RESULTS: While the cartridge energy values are comparable between the two different test protocols, maximum gas pressure measured in the DIN set-up (3907 bar) far surpasses the gas pressure in the C.I.P. protocol (1586 bar). Both test protocols observed higher energy values of the green and yellow cartridges than regulated in DIN 7260.
CONCLUSION: Enormous gas pressure values of more than 3900 bar emphasize the power of industrial blank cartridges. Once again, the harmlessness of these blank cartridges and the weapons/tools that are operated with these propellants is refuted.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19717253     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  7 in total

1.  Wounding capacity of muzzle-gas pressure.

Authors:  Christian Schyma
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Determination of impact parameters and efficiency of 6.8/15 caliber captive bolt guns.

Authors:  Katharina Dörfler; Klaus Troeger; Ernst Lücker; Holger Schönekeß; Matthias Frank
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Wound morphology in contact shots from blank cartridge handguns: a study on composite models.

Authors:  Rebecca Pircher; Markus Große Perdekamp; Annette Thierauf-Emberger; Lena Kramer; Stefan Pollak; Dorothee Geisenberger
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Penetrating chest trauma caused by a blank cartridge actuated rubber ball projectile: case presentation and ballistic investigation of an uncommon weapon type.

Authors:  Matthias Frank; Dieter Peters; Wolfram Klemm; Rico Grossjohann; Axel Ekkernkamp; Britta Bockholdt; Julia Seifert
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Suicide with two makes of captive-bolt guns (livestock stunners) fired simultaneously to the forehead.

Authors:  Rebecca Pircher; Dorothee Geisenberger; Markus Große Perdekamp; Merja Neukamm; Stefan Pollak; Ulrike Schmidt; Annette Thierauf-Emberger
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  An Examination of the Performance of Blank Cartridges Used in Captive Bolt Devices for the Pre-Slaughter Stunning and Euthanasia of Animals.

Authors:  Andrew Grist; Jeff A Lines; Randall Bock; Toby G Knowles; Stephen B Wotton
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  The punched-out tissue complex (skin-bone "imprimatum") in shots from captive-bolt guns: does it act as a secondary projectile?

Authors:  Dorothee Geisenberger; Arianna Giorgetti; Matthieu Glardon; Markus Große Perdekamp; Stefan Pollak; Rebecca Pircher
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.686

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.