Literature DB >> 1971644

Current issues in the antibiotic primary management of the febrile neutropenic cancer patient: a perspective from the National Cancer Institute.

P A Pizzo1.   

Abstract

In summary, the overall approach to the treatment of neutropenic cancer patients is to bridge the neutropenic gap. Empirical therapy serves as an important pillar of support, and a rational programme for modifications of the initial therapy, according to the evolving clinical course of the patient, forms another pillar in bridging this gap (Pizzo & Meyers, 1989). The incorporation of biologicals that might shorten the duration of neutropenia could potentially lead to greater improvements in outcome and greater success for therapy for the febrile neutropenic cancer patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1971644     DOI: 10.1016/0195-6701(90)90078-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  2 in total

1.  The costs of treating febrile neutropenia in patients with malignant blood disorders.

Authors:  B Leese; R Collin; D J Clark
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Ceftriaxone/Amikacin vs Ceftazidime/Amikacin as Empirical Therapy for Fever in Patients with Haematological Malignancy and Severe Granulocytopenia: Clinical and Economic Outcomes.

Authors:  F Rossini; P Pioltelli; S Bolis; L Borin; I Casaroli; E Lanzi; P Maffè; M Parma; P Tripputi; E M Pogliani
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.859

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.