Literature DB >> 19716004

A review of reprocessing techniques of flexible nasopharyngoscopes.

William O Collins1.   

Abstract

To provide assistance to otolaryngologists to decide the best manner in which to reprocess flexible nasopharyngoscopes, a review of existing English language medical literature regarding the methods of flexible endoscope reprocessing was performed, including previously published guidelines from other medical disciplines. Multiple steps were confirmed to be critical to effectively reprocess flexible nasopharyngoscopes. High-level disinfection has been determined to be the minimum level of disinfection required for reprocessing of flexible nasopharyngoscopes. Several steps are important in all reprocessing techniques, including manual cleaning, leak testing, cleaning with an enzymatic agent, high-level disinfection, and drying with vertical storage. Three techniques are available to achieve high-level disinfection: manual disinfection with a liquid disinfectant/sterilant, use of an automated endoscope reprocessor, and use of a disposable sheath. Achieving high-level disinfection of flexible nasopharyngoscopes can be accomplished by a variety of methods. Strict adherence to recommended procedures is critical.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19716004     DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.05.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  7 in total

1.  The contribution of flexible endoscopy for diagnosis of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Gilead Berger; Rachel L Berger
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Distal chip versus fiberoptic laryngoscopy using endoscopic sheaths: diagnostic accuracy and image quality.

Authors:  Boudewijn E C Plaat; Bernard F A M van der Laan; Jan Wedman; György B Halmos; Frederik G Dikkers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The effect of endoscopic sheaths on visualization in distal chip and fiberoptic laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Boudewijn E C Plaat; Bernard F A M van der Laan; Jan Wedman; György B Halmos; Frederik G Dikkers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Experimental Study to Develop a Method for Improving Sample Collection to Monitor Laryngoscopes after Reprocessing.

Authors:  Savina Ditommaso; Monica Giacomuzzi; Elisa Ricciardi; Carla Zotti
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2018-08-21

5.  Evaluating the Quality of Rigid Optic Videolaryngoscopy Image Taken Through Dental Protection Cap and Its Feasibility as Additional Barrier Method Against COVID-19.

Authors:  Mariana Nagata Cavalheiro; Vinicius Ribas Fonseca; Bianca Simone Zeigelboim; Diego F Costa; Lucas Viomar de Lima; Marlon Kleber Bozzo; Rita de Cássia Tonochi; Bruno Ceron Hartmann
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 6.  Phoniatricians and otorhinolaryngologists approaching oropharyngeal dysphagia: an update on FEES.

Authors:  Antonio Schindler; Laura W J Baijens; Ahmed Geneid; Nicole Pizzorni
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.236

7.  Disinfection of otorhinolaryngological endoscopes with electrolyzed acid water: A cross-sectional and multicenter study.

Authors:  Takayuki Okano; Tatsunori Sakamoto; Seiji Ishikawa; Susumu Sakamoto; Masanobu Mizuta; Yuji Kitada; Keisuke Mizuno; Hideki Hayashi; Youichi Suzuki; Takashi Nakano; Koichi Omori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.