Literature DB >> 19715630

The case against choice and competition.

David J Hunter1.   

Abstract

Choice and competition are central planks of the English government's health reforms and modernisation programme. Wales and Scotland have chosen a different path, which calls into question the suggestion that in an age of consumerism there is no other way to secure overdue changes in the provision and management of health care to improve their quality and responsiveness to user preferences. Yet pro-market enthusiasts pursue their agenda in the face of evidence that calls into question the claims they make. It is a curious position for a government that is wedded to evidence-based policy to find itself in. The policy puzzle is why, despite the contested nature of the alleged virtues of choice and competition, policy-makers persist with introducing a set of reforms which appear to threaten the very values and principles they profess to uphold. An alternative reform paradigm exists which acknowledges what makes public services public. This paper sets out the key features of what rediscovering public service entails adopting the notion of co-production as a means of bringing about a new relationship between professionals and the public that remains true to the National Health Service's social purpose.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19715630     DOI: 10.1017/S1744133109990089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ Policy Law        ISSN: 1744-1331


  2 in total

1.  The economics of choice: lessons from the U.S. health-care market.

Authors:  Yaniv Hanoch; Thomas Rice
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Re-thinking barriers to organizational change in public hospitals.

Authors:  Nigel Edwards; Richard B Saltman
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2017-03-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.