Literature DB >> 19715441

Genetic screening for low-penetrance variants in protein-coding genes.

Jill Waalen1, Ernest Beutler.   

Abstract

Genetic testing holds great promise as a screening tool to identify persons at risk for a disease at the presymptomatic stage. However, the complexities of gene-disease associations, even in single-gene diseases, pose important challenges. These challenges include defining the role of screening for mutations that have low penetrance, which cause disease in only a minority of patients with the genotype. On the basis of the high rate of false positives, medical expert panels to date have largely discouraged genetic testing for low-penetrance mutations for use in population-based screening, although official recommendations currently exist for only a few genes. We examine the relatively limited experience of population-based screening for low-penetrance mutations in clinical settings to date, including screening for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency and a low-penetrance mutation for cystic fibrosis in newborns, type 1 Gaucher disease carrier screening, and screening for adults for hemochromatosis. The trend toward recommending restricting use of these tests by medical experts is contrasted with the growing availability of genetic tests, including those for low-penetrance mutations, through direct-to-consumer outlets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19715441     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet        ISSN: 1527-8204            Impact factor:   8.929


  6 in total

1.  Current directions in behavioral medicine research on genetic testing for disease susceptibility: introduction to the special section.

Authors:  Kerry A Sherman; Linda D Cameron
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-10

2.  The changing landscape of genetic testing and its impact on clinical and laboratory services and research in Europe.

Authors:  Ros Hastings; Guido de Wert; Brian Fowler; Michael Krawczak; Eric Vermeulen; Egbert Bakker; Pascal Borry; Wybo Dondorp; Niels Nijsingh; David Barton; Jörg Schmidtke; Carla G van El; Joris Vermeesch; Yrrah Stol; Heidi Carmen Howard; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 3.  Where genotype is not predictive of phenotype: towards an understanding of the molecular basis of reduced penetrance in human inherited disease.

Authors:  David N Cooper; Michael Krawczak; Constantin Polychronakos; Chris Tyler-Smith; Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Genetic Analysis of ABCB4 Mutations and Variants Related to the Pathogenesis and Pathophysiology of Low Phospholipid-Associated Cholelithiasis.

Authors:  Helen H Wang; Piero Portincasa; Min Liu; David Q-H Wang
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.141

5.  Patients' ratings of genetic conditions validate a taxonomy to simplify decisions about preconception carrier screening via genome sequencing.

Authors:  Michael C Leo; Carmit McMullen; Benjamin S Wilfond; Frances L Lynch; Jacob A Reiss; Marian J Gilmore; Patricia Himes; Tia L Kauffman; James V Davis; Gail P Jarvik; Jonathan S Berg; Cary Harding; Kathleen A Kennedy; Dana Kostiner Simpson; Denise I Quigley; C Sue Richards; Alan F Rope; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 6.  Genome interpretation using in silico predictors of variant impact.

Authors:  Panagiotis Katsonis; Kevin Wilhelm; Amanda Williams; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 5.881

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.