OBJECTIVE: To refine the previously developed scleroderma (systemic sclerosis [SSc]) gastrointestinal tract (GIT) instrument (SSC-GIT 1.0). METHODS: We administered the SSC-GIT 1.0 and the Short Form 36 to 152 patients with SSc; 1 item was added to the SSC-GIT 1.0 to assess rectal incontinence. In addition, subjects completed a rating of the severity of their GIT involvement (from very mild to very severe). Evaluation of psychometric properties included internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability (mean time interval 1.1 weeks), and multitrait scaling analysis. RESULTS: Study participants were mostly women (84%) and white (81%); 55% had diffuse SSc. Self-rated severity of GIT involvement ranged from no symptoms to very mild (39%), mild (21%), moderate (31%), and severe/very severe (9%). Of an initial 53 items in the SSC-GIT 1.0, 19 items were excluded, leaving a 34-item revised instrument (the University of California, Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium GIT 2.0 [UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0]). Analyses supported 7 multi-item scales: reflux, distention/bloating, diarrhea, fecal soilage, constipation, emotional well-being, and social functioning. Test-retest reliability estimates were >/=0.68 and coefficient alphas were >/=0.67. Participants who rated their GIT disease as mild had lower scores on a 0-3 scale on all 7 scales. Symptom scales were also able to discriminate subjects with corresponding clinical GIT diagnoses. The Total GIT Score, developed by averaging 6 of 7 scales (excluding constipation), was reliable and provided greater discrimination between mild, moderate, and severe self-rated GIT involvement than individual scales. CONCLUSION: This study provides support for the reliability and validity of the UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0, an improvement over the SSC-GIT 1.0, and supports a Total GIT Score in SSc patients with GIT.
OBJECTIVE: To refine the previously developed scleroderma (systemic sclerosis [SSc]) gastrointestinal tract (GIT) instrument (SSC-GIT 1.0). METHODS: We administered the SSC-GIT 1.0 and the Short Form 36 to 152 patients with SSc; 1 item was added to the SSC-GIT 1.0 to assess rectal incontinence. In addition, subjects completed a rating of the severity of their GIT involvement (from very mild to very severe). Evaluation of psychometric properties included internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability (mean time interval 1.1 weeks), and multitrait scaling analysis. RESULTS: Study participants were mostly women (84%) and white (81%); 55% had diffuse SSc. Self-rated severity of GIT involvement ranged from no symptoms to very mild (39%), mild (21%), moderate (31%), and severe/very severe (9%). Of an initial 53 items in the SSC-GIT 1.0, 19 items were excluded, leaving a 34-item revised instrument (the University of California, Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium GIT 2.0 [UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0]). Analyses supported 7 multi-item scales: reflux, distention/bloating, diarrhea, fecal soilage, constipation, emotional well-being, and social functioning. Test-retest reliability estimates were >/=0.68 and coefficient alphas were >/=0.67. Participants who rated their GIT disease as mild had lower scores on a 0-3 scale on all 7 scales. Symptom scales were also able to discriminate subjects with corresponding clinical GIT diagnoses. The Total GIT Score, developed by averaging 6 of 7 scales (excluding constipation), was reliable and provided greater discrimination between mild, moderate, and severe self-rated GIT involvement than individual scales. CONCLUSION: This study provides support for the reliability and validity of the UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0, an improvement over the SSC-GIT 1.0, and supports a Total GIT Score in SSc patients with GIT.
Authors: Paul J Nietert; Holly C Mitchell; Marcy B Bolster; Margaret Y Curran; Barbara C Tilley; Richard M Silver Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Dinesh Khanna; Ron D Hays; Grace S Park; Yolanda Braun-Moscovici; Maureen D Mayes; Terry A McNearney; Vivien Hsu; Philip J Clements; Daniel E Furst Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2007-10-15
Authors: P Clements; P Lachenbruch; J Siebold; B White; S Weiner; R Martin; A Weinstein; M Weisman; M Mayes; D Collier Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 1995-07 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Puja Khanna; Nikhil Agarwal; Dinesh Khanna; Ron D Hays; Lin Chang; Roger Bolus; Gil Melmed; Cynthia B Whitman; Robert M Kaplan; Rikke Ogawa; Bradley Snyder; Brennan Mr Spiegel Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Dinesh Khanna; Otylia Kowal-Bielecka; Puja P Khanna; Anna Lapinska; Steven M Asch; Neil Wenger; Kevin K Brown; Philip J Clements; Terry Getzug; Maureen D Mayes; Thomas A Medsger; Ronald Oudiz; Robert Simms; Virginia Steen; Paul Maranian; Daniel E Furst Journal: Clin Exp Rheumatol Date: 2011-05-16 Impact factor: 4.473
Authors: Dinesh Khanna; Daniel E Furst; Paul Maranian; James R Seibold; Ann Impens; Maureen D Mayes; Philip J Clements; Terri Getzug; Ron D Hays Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2011-07-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Dinesh Khanna; Daniel E Furst; Yannick Allanore; Sangmee Bae; Vijay Bodukam; Philip J Clements; Maurizio Cutolo; Laszlo Czirjak; Christopher P Denton; Oliver Distler; Ulrich A Walker; Marco Matucci-Cerinic; Ulf Müller-Ladner; James R Seibold; Manjit Singh; Alan Tyndall Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 7.580