Literature DB >> 19714463

Score tests for independence in semiparametric competing risks models.

Mériem Saïd1, Nadia Ghazzali, Louis-Paul Rivest.   

Abstract

A popular model for competing risks postulates the existence of a latent unobserved failure time for each risk. Assuming that these underlying failure times are independent is attractive since it allows standard statistical tools for right-censored lifetime data to be used in the analysis. This paper proposes simple independence score tests for the validity of this assumption when the individual risks are modeled using semiparametric proportional hazards regressions. It assumes that covariates are available, making the model identifiable. The score tests are derived for alternatives that specify that copulas are responsible for a possible dependency between the competing risks. The test statistics are constructed by adding to the partial likelihoods for the individual risks an explanatory variable for the dependency between the risks. A variance estimator is derived by writing the score function and the Fisher information matrix for the marginal models as stochastic integrals. Pitman efficiencies are used to compare test statistics. A simulation study and a numerical example illustrate the methodology proposed in this paper.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19714463     DOI: 10.1007/s10985-009-9123-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  6 in total

1.  A review and critique of some models used in competing risk analysis.

Authors:  M Gail
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A nonidentifiability aspect of the problem of competing risks.

Authors:  A Tsiatis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Regression modeling of competing risks data based on pseudovalues of the cumulative incidence function.

Authors:  John P Klein; Per Kragh Andersen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  How dependent causes of death can make risk factors appear protective.

Authors:  E Slud; D Byar
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks.

Authors:  R L Prentice; J D Kalbfleisch; A V Peterson; N Flournoy; V T Farewell; N E Breslow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Regression survival analysis with an assumed copula for dependent censoring: a sensitivity analysis approach.

Authors:  Xuelin Huang; Nan Zhang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 2.571

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.