Literature DB >> 19714280

Clinical outcomes of lumbar degenerative disc disease treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion allograft spacer: a prospective, multicenter trial with 2-year follow-up.

Paul M Arnold1, Stephen Robbins, Wayne Paullus, Stephen Faust, Richard Holt, Robert McGuire.   

Abstract

The clinical benefits and complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) have been studied over the past 60 years. In recent years, spine surgeons have had the option of treating low back pain caused by degenerative disc disease using PLIF with machined allograft spacers and posterior pedicle fixation. The purpose of this clinical series was to assess the clinical benefits of using a machined PLIF allograft spacer and posterior pedicle fixation to treat degenerative disc disease, both in terms of fusion rates and patient outcomes, and to compare these results with those in previous studies using autograft and metal interbody fusion devices. Results were also compared with results from studies using transverse process fusion. This prospective, nonrandomized clinical series was conducted at 10 US medical centers. Eighty-nine (55 male, 34 female) patients underwent PLIF with a presized, machined allograft spacer and posterior pedicle fixation between January 2000 and April 2003. Their outcomes were compared with outcomes in previous series described in the literature. All patients had experienced at least 6 months of low back pain that had been unresponsive to nonsurgical treatment. Physical examinations were performed before surgery, after surgery, and at 4 follow-up visits (6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months). At each interval, we obtained radiographs and patient outcome measures, including SF-36 Bodily Pain Score, visual analog scale pain rating, and Oswestry Disability Index. The primary outcome was fusion results at 12 and 24 months; the secondary outcomes were pain, disability, function/quality of life, and satisfaction. One-level PLIFs were performed in 65 patients, and 2-level PLIFs in 24 patients. Flexion-extension radiographs at 12 and 24 months revealed a 98% fusion rate. Of the 72 patients who reached the 12-month follow-up, 86% reported decreased pain and disability as measured with the Oswestry Disability Index. Decreased pain as measured with the SF-36 Bodily Pain Score was reported by 74% of patients who reached the 12-month follow-up. The graft-related complication rate among all patients who underwent PLIF was 1.61%. When performed with machined allograft spacers and posterior pedicle fixation, PLIF is a safe and effective surgical treatment for low back pain caused by degenerative disc disease. The patients in this clinical series had outcomes equal or superior to the outcomes in previous series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19714280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)        ISSN: 1078-4519


  13 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic discography: what is the clinical utility?

Authors:  David A Provenzano
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-02

2.  Comparing the early efficacies of autologous bone grafting and interbody fusion cages for treating degenerative lumbar instability in patients of different ages.

Authors:  Hua-Zhang Zhong; Da-Sheng Tian; Yun Zhou; Jue-Hua Jing; Jun Qian; Lei Chen; Bin Zhu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Modified minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a trans-multifidus approach: a safe and effective alternative to open-TLIF.

Authors:  Wenzhi Zhang; Xu Li; Xifu Shang; Xiang Xu; Yefeng Hu; Rui He; Liqun Duan; Xiaodong Ling; Feng Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Two-year clinical and radiographic success of minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach for the treatment of degenerative lumbar conditions.

Authors:  Burak M Ozgur; Vijay Agarwal; Erin Nail; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2010-06-01

5.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion rates in patients using a novel titanium implant and demineralized cancellous allograft bone sponge.

Authors:  Gerard Girasole; Gerard Muro; Abraham Mintz; Jason Chertoff
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2013-12

6.  Temperature Distributions of the Lumbar Intervertebral Disc during Laser Annuloplasty : A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Min Hyung Lee; Il Sup Kim; Jae Taek Hong; Jae Hoon Sung; Sang Won Lee; Daniel H Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-10-24

Review 7.  Allograft Versus Demineralized Bone Matrix in Instrumented and Noninstrumented Lumbar Fusion: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Zorica Buser; Darrel S Brodke; Jim A Youssef; Elke Rometsch; Jong-Beom Park; S Tim Yoon; Jeffrey C Wang; Hans-Joerg Meisel
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-10-25

8.  Clinical and radiological results comparison of allograft and polyetheretherketone cage for one to two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A CONSORT-compliant article.

Authors:  Sen Yang; Yang Yu; Xun Liu; Zehua Zhang; TianYong Hou; Jianzhong Xu; Wenjie Wu; Fei Luo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a modified distractor handle: a midterm clinicoradiological follow-up study.

Authors:  Abuduaini Rewuti; Zixian Chen; Zhenzhou Feng; Yuanwu Cao; Xiaoxing Jiang; Chun Jiang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Pedicle-Screw-Based Dynamic Systems and Degenerative Lumbar Diseases: Biomechanical and Clinical Experiences of Dynamic Fusion with Isobar TTL.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Gilles Perrin; Sabina Champain
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2013-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.