Literature DB >> 19713692

Cochlear implantation in elderly patients: surgical and audiological outcome.

Lela Migirov1, Riki Taitelbaum-Swead, Michael Drendel, Minka Hildesheimer, Jona Kronenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deteriorated hearing affects speech perception and speech production, and negatively impacts on social interaction, employment, income, and, as a result, the quality of life of the elderly population. Lack of satisfaction with conventional hearing aids motivated part of them to turn to more sophisticated cochlear device systems.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcome of cochlear implantation (CI) among elderly cochlear implant recipients.
METHODS: The medical records of 20 postlingual patients aged >65 years at the time of CI, who were followed up for a period of at least 12 months were retrospectively reviewed for age at the time of CI, the cause and duration of deafness, hearing aid experience, comorbidities, complications of the procedure and audiological outcome. Pre- and post-CI speech perception performance was tested using a battery of speech perception tests.
RESULTS: In addition to bilateral severe to profound hearing loss, all 20 patients had some comorbidities and 13 had more than 2 pathologies that are associated with hearing impairment. Major complications such as facial nerve paralysis and foreign body reaction were rare (n = 2). Minor complications such as disequilibrium (n = 5) and wound problems (n = 5) resolved spontaneously or were successfully managed conservatively. There were no complications associated with general anesthesia used during the CI procedure. Statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test showed significant differences (p < 0.01) between the pre- and postspeech perception categories. No significant correlations were found between the background data: unaided thresholds, aided thresholds, duration of profound deafness, duration of hearing aid use prior to CI, speech perception before CI and speech perception performance after CI using Pearson correlations.
CONCLUSION: CI was found to be associated with significant hearing benefit in elderly candidates. However, every CI candidate must be informed about possible complications associated with the procedure, especially related to the vestibular system. At the same time, it should be made clear that life-threatening conditions are rare and that the surgery is usually safe. 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19713692     DOI: 10.1159/000235864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontology        ISSN: 0304-324X            Impact factor:   5.140


  11 in total

1.  The admission patterns of octogenerians nonagenerians and centenarians to the Department of Otoloaryngology.

Authors:  Doron Sagiv; Lela Migirov; Noga Lipschitz; Elad Dagan; Eran Glikson; Michael Wolf; Eran E Alon
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Cochlear implant rehabilitation in older adults: literature review and proposal of a conceptual framework.

Authors:  James H Clark; Jennifer Yeagle; Alicia I Arbaje; Frank R Lin; John K Niparko; Howard W Francis
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 3.  Age-related hearing loss or presbycusis.

Authors:  Qi Huang; Jianguo Tang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Evaluating the Impact of Cochlear Implantation on Cognitive Function in Older Adults.

Authors:  Richard K Gurgel; Kevin Duff; Norman L Foster; Kaitlynn A Urano; Alvin deTorres
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Is cochlear implantation a good treatment method for profoundly deafened elderly?

Authors:  Magdalena Lachowska; Agnieszka Pastuszka; Paulina Glinka; Kazimierz Niemczyk
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.458

6.  Cochlear implantation under local anesthesia: a possible alternative for elderly patients.

Authors:  Nóra Kecskeméti; Magdolna Szőnyi; Marianna Küstel; Anita Gáborján; László Tamás; Gábor Répássy
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  Duration of deafness impacts auditory performance after cochlear implantation: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikolai Bernhard; Ulrich Gauger; Eugenia Romo Ventura; Florian C Uecker; Heidi Olze; Steffen Knopke; Toni Hänsel; Annekatrin Coordes
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-04

Review 8.  Cochlear implantation under local anesthetic: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ben Walters; Peter Gaskell; Jameel Muzaffar; Haissan Iftikhar; Peter Monksfield; Manohar Bance
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-05

9.  Age-dependent variations of scalp thickness in the area designated for a cochlear implant receiver stimulator.

Authors:  Omer J Ungar; Uri Amit; Oren Cavel; Yahav Oron; Ophir Handzel
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-29

10.  Auditory performance in a group of elderly patients after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Alexandros Giourgas; Martin Durisin; Anke Lesinski-Schiedat; Angelika Illg; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.